ICF vs NOBL: Holdings Overlap
ICFiShares Select U.S. REIT ETF
iShares · 30 holdings · $2.1B · as of 2026-04-30
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 69 holdings · $11.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (ICF: 2026-04-30, NOBL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ICF and NOBL?
iShares Select U.S. REIT ETF (ICF, by iShares) holds 30 positions; ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL, by ProShares) holds 69. They have 3 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 3ICF holds 30 · NOBL holds 69
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ICF 7%·NOBL 5%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ICF
27 of 30 positions (92.5% of the fund) are not held by NOBL.
Only in NOBL
66 of 69 positions (95.1% of the fund) are not held by ICF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ICF | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Real Estate | 99.9% | 4.6% |
| Consumer Staples | 0.0% | 23.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 21.8% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.7% |
| Materials | 0.0% | 11.5% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 25.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ICF | -0.2% | +16.2% | +16.7% | +10.4% | +2.6% | +5.2% | 2.42% |
| NOBL | +1.6% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +9.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ICF vs NOBL →
Shared Holdings(3)
The top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by ESS, O and FRT.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ICF and NOBL overlap?
ICF and NOBL overlap by 4.2% of portfolio weight. They share 3 holdings (ICF holds 30 positions and NOBL holds 69), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ICF and NOBL?
The two portfolios are 4.2% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ICF and NOBL?
The largest positions held by both funds are ESS, O and FRT. Together the top 3 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does ICF own that NOBL doesn't?
27 positions (92.5% of ICF) are unique to ICF, led by EQIX, WELL and PLD. In the other direction, 66 positions (95.1% of NOBL) are unique to NOBL.