IEMG vs KWEB: Holdings Overlap
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
KWEBKraneShares CSI China Internet ETF
KraneShares · 31 holdings · $5.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IEMG: 2026-05-31, KWEB: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IEMG and KWEB?
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697 positions; KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB, by KraneShares) holds 31. They have 29 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 29IEMG holds 2697 · KWEB holds 31
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IEMG 6%·KWEB 96%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IEMG
2668 of 2697 positions (93.3% of the fund) are not held by KWEB. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IEMG | KWEB |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.0% | 39.5% |
| Information Technology | 36.2% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 4.6% | 29.3% |
| Financials | 11.0% | 0.0% |
| Real Estate | 0.7% | 4.3% |
| Other Sectors | 10.6% | 7.6% |
| Unclassified | 30.7% | 19.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of IEMG, 19% of KWEB).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
| KWEB | +12.3% | -15.8% | -15.2% | +2.0% | -6.7% | +0.1% | 7.31% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IEMG vs KWEB →
Shared Holdings(29)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and PDD.
2.37% | 10.09% | 2.37% | |
1.82% | 8.93% | 1.82% | |
0.41% | 8.78% | 0.41% | |
0.33% | 7.36% | 0.33% | |
0.29% | 5.91% | 0.29% | |
0.26% | 4.28% | 0.26% | |
0.24% | 4.91% | 0.24% | |
0.20% | 3.56% | 0.20% | |
0.10% | 3.33% | 0.10% | |
0.08% | 4.34% | 0.08% | |
0.04% | 4.01% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 2.50% | 0.04% | |
0.04% | 2.86% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 2.70% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 3.17% | 0.03% | |
0.03% | 3.24% | 0.03% | |
0.02% | 1.82% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 2.23% | 0.02% | |
0.02% | 1.90% | 0.02% | |
0.01% | 1.34% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 1.04% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 0.98% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 1.06% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 1.10% | 0.01% | |
0.01% | 1.12% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IEMG and KWEB overlap?
IEMG and KWEB overlap by 6.5% of portfolio weight. They share 29 holdings (IEMG holds 2697 positions and KWEB holds 31), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IEMG and KWEB?
The two portfolios are 6.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IEMG and KWEB?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, PDD, 3690 and 9999. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does IEMG own that KWEB doesn't?
2668 positions (93.3% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 2 positions (4.1% of KWEB) are unique to KWEB.