IEMG vs MCHI: Holdings Overlap
IEMGiShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 2697 holdings · $156.6B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are IEMG and MCHI?
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG, by iShares) holds 2697 positions; iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580. They have 507 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 17.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 17.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 507IEMG holds 2697 · MCHI holds 580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IEMG 18%·MCHI 98%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IEMG
2190 of 2697 positions (81.8% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MCHI
73 of 580 positions (1.5% of the fund) are not held by IEMG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IEMG | MCHI |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 36.2% | 7.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 6.0% | 21.1% |
| Communication Services | 4.6% | 17.2% |
| Financials | 11.0% | 14.8% |
| Materials | 2.9% | 1.8% |
| Other Sectors | 8.4% | 8.3% |
| Unclassified | 30.7% | 28.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (31% of IEMG, 29% of MCHI).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IEMG | +0.3% | +19.9% | +33.4% | +20.1% | +7.8% | +9.0% | 2.25% |
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IEMG vs MCHI →
Shared Holdings(507)
The top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and C6T.
2.37% | 13.21% | 2.37% | |
1.82% | 10.14% | 1.82% | |
0.71% | 3.97% | 0.71% | |
0.42% | 2.35% | 0.42% | |
0.41% | 2.28% | 0.41% | |
0.38% | 2.10% | 0.38% | |
0.35% | 1.96% | 0.35% | |
0.33% | 1.84% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 1.80% | 0.32% | |
0.29% | 1.63% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 1.63% | 0.29% | |
0.26% | 1.44% | 0.26% | |
0.24% | 1.31% | 0.24% | |
0.20% | 1.12% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 1.11% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 1.05% | 0.19% | |
0.17% | 0.97% | 0.17% | |
0.17% | 0.94% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.90% | 0.16% | |
0.14% | 0.77% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.74% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.74% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.64% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.63% | 0.11% | |
0.11% | 0.58% | 0.11% |
Showing the top 250 of 507 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IEMG and MCHI overlap?
IEMG and MCHI overlap by 17.9% of portfolio weight. They share 507 holdings (IEMG holds 2697 positions and MCHI holds 580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IEMG and MCHI?
The two portfolios are 17.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IEMG and MCHI?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, C6T, 1810 and PDD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the total overlap.
What does IEMG own that MCHI doesn't?
2190 positions (81.8% of IEMG) are unique to IEMG, led by TSMWF, 005930 and 000660. In the other direction, 73 positions (1.5% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI.