IFRA vs MTUM: Holdings Overlap
IFRAiShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 162 holdings · $4.6B · as of 2026-03-31
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IFRA: 2026-03-31, MTUM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IFRA and MTUM?
iShares U.S. Infrastructure ETF (IFRA, by iShares) holds 162 positions; iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15IFRA holds 162 · MTUM holds 125
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IFRA 21%·MTUM 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IFRA
147 of 162 positions (78.7% of the fund) are not held by MTUM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IFRA | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 44.3% |
| Utilities | 41.4% | 1.6% |
| Industrials | 35.2% | 15.6% |
| Materials | 13.6% | 1.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 10.3% |
| Other Sectors | 8.8% | 26.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of IFRA, 0% of MTUM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFRA | -1.1% | +17.1% | +22.3% | +17.8% | +13.3% | — | 1.59% |
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IFRA vs MTUM →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the overlap, led by CAT, ETR and PWR.
4.20% | 3.21% | 3.21% | |
1.37% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
3.41% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
2.01% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.80% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
1.91% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.60% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.50% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.36% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
1.02% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.76% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.82% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.82% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
0.50% | 0.05% | 0.05% | |
1.02% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IFRA and MTUM overlap?
IFRA and MTUM overlap by 5.7% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (IFRA holds 162 positions and MTUM holds 125), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IFRA and MTUM?
The two portfolios are 5.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IFRA and MTUM?
The largest positions held by both funds are CAT, ETR, PWR, FIX and NRG. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 95% of the total overlap.
What does IFRA own that MTUM doesn't?
147 positions (78.7% of IFRA) are unique to IFRA, led by NEE, UNP and CSX. In the other direction, 110 positions (94.1% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM.