IGV vs XLK: Holdings Overlap
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
XLKState Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 73 holdings · $122.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IGV: 2026-03-31, XLK: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IGV and XLK?
iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112 positions; State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 73. They have 21 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 22.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 22.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 21IGV holds 112 · XLK holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IGV 75%·XLK 24%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IGV
91 of 112 positions (25.2% of the fund) are not held by XLK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IGV | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 90.6% | 99.9% |
| Communication Services | 8.2% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 0.2% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
| XLK | +4.9% | +30.9% | +43.5% | +30.7% | +20.3% | +24.4% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IGV vs XLK →
Shared Holdings(21)
The top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the overlap, led by MSFT, PLTR and PANW.
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 8.36% | 10.04% | 8.36% |
|---|---|---|---|
 PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc., Class A | 8.82% | 2.36% | 2.36% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 5.48% | 1.93% | 1.93% |
 ORCLOracle Corp. COM | 8.24% | 1.61% | 1.61% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 4.21% | 1.39% | 1.39% |
 CRMSalesforce Inc. COM | 7.40% | 1.01% | 1.01% |
 NOWServicenow Inc COM | 4.38% | 0.80% | 0.80% |
 ADBEAdobe Inc COM | 4.27% | 0.69% | 0.69% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 2.21% | 0.66% | 0.66% |
 CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. COM | 3.24% | 0.62% | 0.62% |
 INTUIntuit Inc COM | 4.75% | 0.59% | 0.59% |
 SNPSSynopsys Inc COM | 3.25% | 0.51% | 0.51% |
 DDOGDatadog, Inc., Class A | 1.66% | 0.50% | 0.50% |
 ADSKAutodesk Inc COM | 2.17% | 0.34% | 0.34% |
 ROPRoper Technologies Inc COM | 1.61% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
 WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 1.18% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
 FICOFair Isaac Corporation COM | 1.08% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
 PTCPTC Inc COM | 0.73% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 0.44% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
 TRMBTrimble Inc COM | 0.66% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
 TYLTyler Technologies Inc. COM | 0.63% | 0.09% | 0.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IGV and XLK overlap?
IGV and XLK overlap by 22.4% of portfolio weight. They share 21 holdings (IGV holds 112 positions and XLK holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IGV and XLK?
The two portfolios are 22.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IGV and XLK?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, PLTR, PANW, ORCL and CRWD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 87% of the total overlap.
What does IGV own that XLK doesn't?
91 positions (25.2% of IGV) are unique to IGV, led by APP, EA and MSTR. In the other direction, 52 positions (75.8% of XLK) are unique to XLK.