IJH vs SCHM: Holdings Overlap
IJHiShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
iShares · 399 holdings · $126.1B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 496 holdings · $15.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IJH: 2026-03-31, SCHM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJH and SCHM?
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF (IJH, by iShares) holds 399 positions; Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM, by Schwab) holds 496. They have 301 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 54.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 54.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 301IJH holds 399 · SCHM holds 496
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJH 84%·SCHM 55%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJH
98 of 399 positions (15.2% of the fund) are not held by SCHM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJH | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 25.3% | 22.5% |
| Information Technology | 12.3% | 20.2% |
| Financials | 14.6% | 11.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.3% | 9.5% |
| Health Care | 8.9% | 10.8% |
| Other Sectors | 27.1% | 25.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJH | +3.1% | +18.4% | +26.0% | +14.5% | +9.0% | +11.2% | 1.14% |
| SCHM | +1.6% | +20.7% | +28.9% | +15.8% | +8.2% | +11.2% | 1.22% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJH vs SCHM →
Shared Holdings(301)
The top 10 shared positions account for 9% of the overlap, led by FLEX, TWLO and CASY.
0.75% | 1.03% | 0.75% | |
0.60% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
0.84% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.87% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.78% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.60% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.71% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.80% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.62% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.45% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.58% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.61% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.56% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.62% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.48% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.56% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.39% | 0.49% | 0.39% | |
0.42% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.67% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.63% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.40% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.54% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.50% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.56% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.39% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
Showing the top 250 of 301 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJH and SCHM overlap?
IJH and SCHM overlap by 54.6% of portfolio weight. They share 301 holdings (IJH holds 399 positions and SCHM holds 496), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJH and SCHM?
The two portfolios are 54.6% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJH and SCHM?
The largest positions held by both funds are FLEX, TWLO, CASY, FTI and CW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 9% of the total overlap.
What does IJH own that SCHM doesn't?
98 positions (15.2% of IJH) are unique to IJH, led by ILMN, P and TRU. In the other direction, 195 positions (44.9% of SCHM) are unique to SCHM.