IJJ vs SCHM: Holdings Overlap
IJJiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
iShares · 301 holdings · $9.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 496 holdings · $15.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IJJ: 2026-03-31, SCHM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJJ and SCHM?
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IJJ, by iShares) holds 301 positions; Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM, by Schwab) holds 496. They have 223 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 35.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 35.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 223IJJ holds 301 · SCHM holds 496
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJJ 83%·SCHM 36%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJJ
78 of 301 positions (16.3% of the fund) are not held by SCHM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJJ | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 19.0% | 22.5% |
| Financials | 22.4% | 11.7% |
| Information Technology | 7.0% | 20.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.4% | 9.5% |
| Health Care | 3.2% | 10.8% |
| Other Sectors | 35.1% | 25.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJJ | +3.0% | +15.1% | +23.8% | +12.8% | +9.2% | +10.5% | 1.56% |
| SCHM | +1.6% | +20.7% | +28.9% | +15.8% | +8.2% | +11.2% | 1.22% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJJ vs SCHM →
Shared Holdings(223)
The top 10 shared positions account for 10% of the overlap, led by NXT, ENTG and BURL.
0.40% | 0.43% | 0.40% | |
0.68% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.50% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.09% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.01% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.81% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
1.30% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.33% | 0.37% | 0.33% | |
0.84% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.46% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.45% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.97% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.05% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.86% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.29% | 0.40% | 0.29% | |
0.50% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.72% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.83% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.01% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.28% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.45% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.26% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.49% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.68% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.38% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJJ and SCHM overlap?
IJJ and SCHM overlap by 35.5% of portfolio weight. They share 223 holdings (IJJ holds 301 positions and SCHM holds 496), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJJ and SCHM?
The two portfolios are 35.5% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJJ and SCHM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NXT, ENTG, BURL, AA and RS. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 10% of the total overlap.
What does IJJ own that SCHM doesn't?
78 positions (16.3% of IJJ) are unique to IJJ, led by VNOM, ILMN and CG. In the other direction, 273 positions (64.1% of SCHM) are unique to SCHM.