IJK vs SCHM: Holdings Overlap
IJKiShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF
iShares · 242 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 496 holdings · $15.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IJK: 2026-03-31, SCHM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IJK and SCHM?
iShares S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IJK, by iShares) holds 242 positions; Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM, by Schwab) holds 496. They have 188 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 37.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 37.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 188IJK holds 242 · SCHM holds 496
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IJK 86%·SCHM 37%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IJK
54 of 242 positions (14.2% of the fund) are not held by SCHM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IJK | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 31.3% | 22.5% |
| Information Technology | 17.3% | 20.2% |
| Health Care | 14.4% | 10.8% |
| Financials | 7.2% | 11.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.2% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 19.4% | 25.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IJK | +3.1% | +21.4% | +27.9% | +15.9% | +8.4% | +11.3% | 0.52% |
| SCHM | +1.6% | +20.7% | +28.9% | +15.8% | +8.2% | +11.2% | 1.22% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IJK vs SCHM →
Shared Holdings(188)
The top 10 shared positions account for 15% of the overlap, led by FLEX, TWLO and CASY.
1.48% | 1.03% | 1.03% | |
1.17% | 0.54% | 0.54% | |
1.65% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.71% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.54% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.17% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.77% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
1.40% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
1.57% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.21% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.88% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
1.15% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.20% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.71% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.21% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.67% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.44% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.82% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.31% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.76% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.46% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.09% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.26% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.05% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
1.15% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IJK and SCHM overlap?
IJK and SCHM overlap by 37.4% of portfolio weight. They share 188 holdings (IJK holds 242 positions and SCHM holds 496), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IJK and SCHM?
The two portfolios are 37.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IJK and SCHM?
The largest positions held by both funds are FLEX, TWLO, CASY, FTI and CW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 15% of the total overlap.
What does IJK own that SCHM doesn't?
54 positions (14.2% of IJK) are unique to IJK, led by P, HL and AEIS. In the other direction, 308 positions (62.5% of SCHM) are unique to SCHM.