ITOT vs SCHG: Holdings Overlap
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
iShares · 2487 holdings · $97.6B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ITOT: 2026-03-31, SCHG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ITOT and SCHG?
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT, by iShares) holds 2487 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193. They have 191 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 48.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 48.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 191ITOT holds 2487 · SCHG holds 193
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ITOT 49%·SCHG 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ITOT
2296 of 2487 positions (51.0% of the fund) are not held by SCHG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SCHG
2 of 193 positions (0.1% of the fund) are not held by ITOT.
CCLCarnival Corp Ltd0.13%
- Fervo Energy Co0.01%
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ITOT | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.8% | 45.9% |
| Communication Services | 9.7% | 15.3% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 6.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.9% | 12.3% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 6.6% |
| Other Sectors | 26.2% | 13.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOT | +3.3% | +14.6% | +24.1% | +20.9% | +12.3% | +14.9% | 0.97% |
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ITOT vs SCHG →
Shared Holdings(191)
The top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
6.69% | 11.01% | 6.69% | |
5.88% | 9.83% | 5.88% | |
4.34% | 7.17% | 4.34% | |
3.21% | 5.67% | 3.21% | |
2.64% | 4.75% | 2.64% | |
2.32% | 4.55% | 2.32% | |
2.12% | 3.78% | 2.12% | |
1.98% | 3.45% | 1.98% | |
1.65% | 3.91% | 1.65% | |
1.15% | 3.05% | 1.15% | |
0.80% | 1.92% | 0.80% | |
0.70% | 1.48% | 0.70% | |
0.64% | 1.40% | 0.64% | |
0.64% | 1.27% | 0.64% | |
0.53% | 1.25% | 0.53% | |
0.52% | 2.93% | 0.52% | |
0.47% | 1.18% | 0.47% | |
0.39% | 1.20% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.91% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.81% | 0.36% | |
0.30% | 0.88% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 0.65% | 0.29% | |
0.28% | 0.62% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.63% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 0.53% | 0.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ITOT and SCHG overlap?
ITOT and SCHG overlap by 48.7% of portfolio weight. They share 191 holdings (ITOT holds 2487 positions and SCHG holds 193), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ITOT and SCHG?
The two portfolios are 48.7% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ITOT and SCHG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 66% of the total overlap.
What does ITOT own that SCHG doesn't?
2296 positions (51.0% of ITOT) are unique to ITOT, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM. In the other direction, 2 positions (0.1% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG.