ITOT vs XLG: Holdings Overlap
ITOTiShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF
iShares · 2487 holdings · $97.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 51 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (ITOT: 2026-03-31, XLG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ITOT and XLG?
iShares Core S&P Total U.S. Stock Market ETF (ITOT, by iShares) holds 2487 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG, by Invesco) holds 51. They have 51 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 52.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 52.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 51ITOT holds 2487 · XLG holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ITOT 53%·XLG 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ITOT
2436 of 2487 positions (47.1% of the fund) are not held by XLG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XLG
Every position in XLG is also held by ITOT, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ITOT | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 30.8% | 43.7% |
| Communication Services | 9.7% | 17.0% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.9% | 11.3% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 1.9% |
| Other Sectors | 26.2% | 16.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ITOT | +3.3% | +14.6% | +24.1% | +20.9% | +12.3% | +14.9% | 0.97% |
| XLG | +3.7% | +7.2% | +17.9% | +22.2% | +14.3% | +16.6% | 0.63% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ITOT vs XLG →
Shared Holdings(51)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
6.69% | 13.04% | 6.69% | |
5.88% | 10.71% | 5.88% | |
4.34% | 8.14% | 4.34% | |
3.21% | 6.96% | 3.21% | |
2.64% | 6.03% | 2.64% | |
2.32% | 4.83% | 2.32% | |
2.12% | 4.80% | 2.12% | |
1.98% | 3.60% | 1.98% | |
1.65% | 2.89% | 1.65% | |
1.39% | 2.34% | 1.39% | |
1.25% | 2.27% | 1.25% | |
1.15% | 1.99% | 1.15% | |
1.12% | 1.73% | 1.12% | |
0.93% | 1.49% | 0.93% | |
0.86% | 1.56% | 0.86% | |
0.80% | 1.49% | 0.80% | |
0.70% | 1.21% | 0.70% | |
0.64% | 1.10% | 0.64% | |
0.64% | 1.06% | 0.64% | |
0.61% | 0.97% | 0.61% | |
0.61% | 1.00% | 0.61% | |
0.53% | 0.92% | 0.53% | |
0.53% | 0.85% | 0.53% | |
0.52% | 1.55% | 0.52% | |
0.52% | 1.11% | 0.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ITOT and XLG overlap?
ITOT and XLG overlap by 52.6% of portfolio weight. They share 51 holdings (ITOT holds 2487 positions and XLG holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ITOT and XLG?
The two portfolios are 52.6% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ITOT and XLG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does ITOT own that XLG doesn't?
2436 positions (47.1% of ITOT) are unique to ITOT, led by MU, AMAT and LRCX. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of XLG) are unique to XLG.