IVW vs SCHG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 143 holdings · $77.3B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IVW: 2026-03-31, SCHG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IVW and SCHG?
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW, by iShares) holds 143 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193. They have 70 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 66.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 66.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 70IVW holds 143 · SCHG holds 193
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IVW 76%·SCHG 83%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IVW
73 of 143 positions (24.2% of the fund) are not held by SCHG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IVW | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 47.7% | 45.9% |
| Communication Services | 16.8% | 15.3% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.4% | 12.3% |
| Financials | 9.8% | 6.8% |
| Health Care | 6.8% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 9.4% | 11.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IVW | +4.4% | +15.5% | +25.3% | +26.7% | +14.0% | +17.7% | 0.35% |
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IVW vs SCHG →
Shared Holdings(70)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AAPL.
14.62% | 11.01% | 11.01% | |
9.48% | 7.17% | 7.17% | |
6.43% | 9.83% | 6.43% | |
5.78% | 4.75% | 4.75% | |
5.06% | 4.55% | 4.55% | |
4.63% | 3.78% | 3.78% | |
3.72% | 5.67% | 3.72% | |
4.32% | 3.45% | 3.45% | |
2.51% | 3.05% | 2.51% | |
2.24% | 3.91% | 2.24% | |
1.40% | 1.27% | 1.27% | |
1.15% | 1.25% | 1.15% | |
1.14% | 2.93% | 1.14% | |
0.96% | 1.92% | 0.96% | |
0.94% | 1.40% | 0.94% | |
0.81% | 0.91% | 0.81% | |
0.67% | 0.88% | 0.67% | |
0.53% | 1.18% | 0.53% | |
0.56% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.51% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.47% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.44% | 0.57% | 0.44% | |
0.37% | 0.58% | 0.37% | |
0.34% | 0.64% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.42% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IVW and SCHG overlap?
IVW and SCHG overlap by 66.3% of portfolio weight. They share 70 holdings (IVW holds 143 positions and SCHG holds 193), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IVW and SCHG?
The two portfolios are 66.3% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IVW and SCHG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does IVW own that SCHG doesn't?
73 positions (24.2% of IVW) are unique to IVW, led by BRK-B, JPM and MU. In the other direction, 123 positions (16.8% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG.