IWD vs SCHG: Holdings Overlap
IWDiShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
iShares · 866 holdings · $83.6B · as of 2026-03-31
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWD: 2026-03-31, SCHG: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWD and SCHG?
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF (IWD, by iShares) holds 866 positions; Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193. They have 111 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 18.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 18.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 111IWD holds 866 · SCHG holds 193
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWD 18%·SCHG 38%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWD
755 of 866 positions (81.6% of the fund) are not held by SCHG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWD | SCHG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 11.7% | 45.9% |
| Financials | 20.0% | 6.8% |
| Communication Services | 7.9% | 15.3% |
| Industrials | 13.4% | 6.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.0% | 12.3% |
| Other Sectors | 39.8% | 13.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWD | +4.0% | +23.3% | +34.5% | +19.0% | +11.9% | +11.7% | 1.36% |
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWD vs SCHG →
Shared Holdings(111)
The top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the overlap, led by GOOGL, AMZN and GOOG.
1.95% | 4.75% | 1.95% | |
1.81% | 5.67% | 1.81% | |
1.59% | 3.78% | 1.59% | |
0.81% | 1.20% | 0.81% | |
0.77% | 0.81% | 0.77% | |
0.73% | 3.45% | 0.73% | |
0.61% | 0.65% | 0.61% | |
0.56% | 0.63% | 0.56% | |
0.50% | 0.62% | 0.50% | |
0.48% | 0.52% | 0.48% | |
0.45% | 2.93% | 0.45% | |
0.42% | 0.45% | 0.42% | |
0.39% | 0.40% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.36% | 0.39% | 0.36% | |
0.32% | 0.37% | 0.32% | |
0.33% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
0.29% | 0.31% | 0.29% | |
0.22% | 0.25% | 0.22% | |
0.26% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 0.22% | 0.20% | |
0.17% | 0.25% | 0.17% | |
0.16% | 0.17% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.23% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.22% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWD and SCHG overlap?
IWD and SCHG overlap by 18.1% of portfolio weight. They share 111 holdings (IWD holds 866 positions and SCHG holds 193), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWD and SCHG?
The two portfolios are 18.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWD and SCHG?
The largest positions held by both funds are GOOGL, AMZN, GOOG, UNH and LIN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 54% of the total overlap.
What does IWD own that SCHG doesn't?
755 positions (81.6% of IWD) are unique to IWD, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM. In the other direction, 82 positions (62.3% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG.