IWF vs FELG: Holdings Overlap
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
FELGFidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF
Fidelity · 100 holdings · $5.8B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWF and FELG?
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387 positions; Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG, by Fidelity) holds 100. They have 71 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 75.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 75.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 71IWF holds 387 · FELG holds 100
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWF 81%·FELG 92%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWF
316 of 387 positions (18.4% of the fund) are not held by FELG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWF | FELG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.2% | 51.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.1% | 11.4% |
| Communication Services | 12.4% | 12.6% |
| Industrials | 6.7% | 8.6% |
| Health Care | 8.0% | 8.1% |
| Other Sectors | 10.4% | 7.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
| FELG | +3.4% | +7.3% | +16.4% | — | — | — | 0.34% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWF vs FELG →
Shared Holdings(71)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
12.92% | 13.29% | 12.92% | |
11.64% | 12.03% | 11.64% | |
8.82% | 8.19% | 8.19% | |
4.79% | 5.23% | 4.79% | |
4.66% | 4.22% | 4.22% | |
3.55% | 3.83% | 3.55% | |
3.54% | 3.61% | 3.54% | |
3.46% | 3.93% | 3.46% | |
2.87% | 3.22% | 2.87% | |
2.66% | 2.91% | 2.66% | |
1.45% | 1.98% | 1.45% | |
1.39% | 1.92% | 1.39% | |
1.84% | 1.32% | 1.32% | |
1.06% | 1.55% | 1.06% | |
1.60% | 1.05% | 1.05% | |
0.97% | 1.48% | 0.97% | |
1.47% | 0.95% | 0.95% | |
1.15% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.90% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
0.85% | 0.64% | 0.64% | |
0.56% | 1.07% | 0.56% | |
0.52% | 1.06% | 0.52% | |
0.46% | 0.65% | 0.46% | |
0.70% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.53% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWF and FELG overlap?
IWF and FELG overlap by 75.5% of portfolio weight. They share 71 holdings (IWF holds 387 positions and FELG holds 100), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWF and FELG?
The two portfolios are 75.5% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWF and FELG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO and AMZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does IWF own that FELG doesn't?
316 positions (18.4% of IWF) are unique to IWF, led by KO, AMGN and BKNG. In the other direction, 29 positions (6.7% of FELG) are unique to FELG.