IWF vs IUSG: Holdings Overlap
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
IUSGiShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF
iShares · 385 holdings · $33.6B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are IWF and IUSG?
iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387 positions; iShares Core S&P U.S. Growth ETF (IUSG, by iShares) holds 385. They have 177 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 71.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 71.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 177IWF holds 387 · IUSG holds 385
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWF 86%·IUSG 83%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWF
210 of 387 positions (13.5% of the fund) are not held by IUSG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWF | IUSG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.2% | 46.0% |
| Communication Services | 12.4% | 16.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 13.1% | 9.4% |
| Financials | 5.9% | 9.6% |
| Industrials | 6.7% | 8.1% |
| Other Sectors | 12.5% | 10.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
| IUSG | +4.3% | +15.9% | +25.6% | +26.2% | +13.9% | +17.5% | 0.48% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWF vs IUSG →
Shared Holdings(177)
The top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AAPL.
12.92% | 13.84% | 12.92% | |
8.82% | 8.97% | 8.82% | |
11.64% | 6.08% | 6.08% | |
4.79% | 4.79% | 4.79% | |
3.54% | 5.47% | 3.54% | |
4.66% | 3.52% | 3.52% | |
3.46% | 4.09% | 3.46% | |
2.87% | 4.38% | 2.87% | |
2.66% | 2.38% | 2.38% | |
3.55% | 2.12% | 2.12% | |
1.47% | 1.33% | 1.33% | |
1.15% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
1.84% | 0.91% | 0.91% | |
1.45% | 0.89% | 0.89% | |
0.97% | 0.87% | 0.87% | |
0.85% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
0.69% | 1.08% | 0.69% | |
0.70% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
1.39% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.59% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.56% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.06% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.52% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.46% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.89% | 0.42% | 0.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWF and IUSG overlap?
IWF and IUSG overlap by 71.5% of portfolio weight. They share 177 holdings (IWF holds 387 positions and IUSG holds 385), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWF and IUSG?
The two portfolios are 71.5% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWF and IUSG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, AVGO and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 71% of the total overlap.
What does IWF own that IUSG doesn't?
210 positions (13.5% of IWF) are unique to IWF, led by COST, HD and VRTX. In the other direction, 208 positions (17.4% of IUSG) are unique to IUSG.