IWM vs XLG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 1941 holdings · $82.2B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 51 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IWM: 2026-03-31, XLG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWM and XLG?
iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM, by iShares) holds 1941 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG, by Invesco) holds 51. They have 0 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 0IWM holds 1941 · XLG holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWM 0%·XLG 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWM
1941 of 1941 positions (99.7% of the fund) are not held by XLG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWM | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 13.6% | 43.7% |
| Industrials | 17.9% | 1.9% |
| Communication Services | 2.5% | 17.0% |
| Health Care | 16.6% | 7.0% |
| Financials | 15.3% | 9.6% |
| Other Sectors | 28.2% | 20.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.5% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of IWM, 0% of XLG).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWM | +1.8% | +23.0% | +38.6% | +17.1% | +7.5% | +10.8% | 0.88% |
| XLG | +3.7% | +7.2% | +17.9% | +22.2% | +14.3% | +16.6% | 0.63% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWM vs XLG →
Shared Holdings(0)
These two funds have no holdings in common.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWM and XLG overlap?
IWM and XLG overlap by 0.0% of portfolio weight. They share 0 holdings (IWM holds 1941 positions and XLG holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWM and XLG?
The two portfolios are 0.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What does IWM own that XLG doesn't?
1941 positions (99.7% of IWM) are unique to IWM, led by BE, CDE and FN. In the other direction, 51 positions (99.6% of XLG) are unique to XLG.