IWP vs SCHM: Holdings Overlap
IWPiShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF
iShares · 277 holdings · $20.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 496 holdings · $15.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (IWP: 2026-03-31, SCHM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWP and SCHM?
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Growth ETF (IWP, by iShares) holds 277 positions; Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM, by Schwab) holds 496. They have 134 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 14.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 14.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 134IWP holds 277 · SCHM holds 496
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWP 22%·SCHM 26%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWP
143 of 277 positions (78.1% of the fund) are not held by SCHM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWP | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 24.4% | 22.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.2% | 9.5% |
| Information Technology | 15.6% | 20.2% |
| Health Care | 14.9% | 10.8% |
| Financials | 8.5% | 11.7% |
| Other Sectors | 15.3% | 25.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWP | +1.5% | +5.4% | +3.1% | +14.6% | +5.1% | +12.1% | 0.34% |
| SCHM | +1.6% | +20.7% | +28.9% | +15.8% | +8.2% | +11.2% | 1.22% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWP vs SCHM →
Shared Holdings(134)
The top 10 shared positions account for 26% of the overlap, led by TPR, ASTS and FTAI.
0.95% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.60% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.90% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.98% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
0.74% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.39% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.39% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.54% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
0.39% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.33% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.46% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.39% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.37% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.45% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.40% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.39% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.34% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.20% | 0.25% | 0.20% | |
0.26% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.22% | 0.19% | |
0.19% | 0.39% | 0.19% | |
0.39% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.34% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.20% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.20% | 0.17% | 0.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWP and SCHM overlap?
IWP and SCHM overlap by 14.8% of portfolio weight. They share 134 holdings (IWP holds 277 positions and SCHM holds 496), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWP and SCHM?
The two portfolios are 14.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWP and SCHM?
The largest positions held by both funds are TPR, ASTS, FTAI, TPL and BURL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 26% of the total overlap.
What does IWP own that SCHM doesn't?
143 positions (78.1% of IWP) are unique to IWP, led by VRT, HWM and RCL. In the other direction, 362 positions (73.9% of SCHM) are unique to SCHM.