IWY vs XLK: Holdings Overlap
IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF
iShares · 110 holdings · $16.6B · as of 2026-03-31
XLKState Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 73 holdings · $122.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (IWY: 2026-03-31, XLK: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IWY and XLK?
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth ETF (IWY, by iShares) holds 110 positions; State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 73. They have 28 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 51.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 51.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 28IWY holds 110 · XLK holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IWY 53%·XLK 74%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IWY
82 of 110 positions (47.0% of the fund) are not held by XLK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XLK
45 of 73 positions (25.9% of the fund) are not held by IWY. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IWY | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 53.1% | 99.9% |
| Communication Services | 13.0% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.3% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 7.5% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 5.9% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 9.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IWY | +2.5% | +5.3% | +13.9% | +22.5% | +13.7% | +18.8% | 0.34% |
| XLK | +4.9% | +30.9% | +43.5% | +30.7% | +20.3% | +24.4% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IWY vs XLK →
Shared Holdings(28)
The top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 14.62% | 14.35% | 14.35% |
|---|---|---|---|
 AAPLApple Inc. COM | 13.13% | 12.41% | 12.41% |
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 9.91% | 10.04% | 9.91% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 4.31% | 5.39% | 4.31% |
 PLTRPalantir Technologies, Inc., Class A | 1.36% | 2.36% | 1.36% |
 LRCXLam Research Corporation COM NEW | 1.14% | 2.53% | 1.14% |
 ORCLOracle Corp. COM | 1.05% | 1.61% | 1.05% |
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 0.82% | 1.67% | 0.82% |
 AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc. COM | 0.81% | 4.11% | 0.81% |
 APHAmphenol Corporation CL A | 0.66% | 1.39% | 0.66% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 0.55% | 1.93% | 0.55% |
 ANETArista Networks Inc COM SHS | 0.54% | 1.31% | 0.54% |
 INTUIntuit Inc COM | 0.50% | 0.59% | 0.50% |
 NOWServicenow Inc COM | 0.46% | 0.80% | 0.46% |
 ADBEAdobe Inc COM | 0.42% | 0.69% | 0.42% |
 CRWDCrowdstrike Holdings, Inc., Class A | 0.41% | 1.39% | 0.41% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 0.33% | 2.77% | 0.33% |
 CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. COM | 0.32% | 0.62% | 0.32% |
 TXNTexas Instruments Inc. COM | 0.31% | 1.67% | 0.31% |
 SNPSSynopsys Inc COM | 0.24% | 0.51% | 0.24% |
 ADSKAutodesk Inc COM | 0.22% | 0.34% | 0.22% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 0.21% | 0.66% | 0.21% |
 QCOMQUALCOMM Inc. COM | 0.13% | 1.12% | 0.13% |
 MSIMotorola Solutions Inc COM NEW | 0.13% | 0.52% | 0.13% |
 WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 0.12% | 0.23% | 0.12% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IWY and XLK overlap?
IWY and XLK overlap by 51.9% of portfolio weight. They share 28 holdings (IWY holds 110 positions and XLK holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IWY and XLK?
The two portfolios are 51.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IWY and XLK?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO and PLTR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 90% of the total overlap.
What does IWY own that XLK doesn't?
82 positions (47.0% of IWY) are unique to IWY, led by AMZN, GOOGL and TSLA. In the other direction, 45 positions (25.9% of XLK) are unique to XLK.