IXJ vs VT: Holdings Overlap
IXJiShares Global Healthcare ETF
iShares · 123 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-03-31
VTVanguard Total World Stock Index Fund
Vanguard · 10033 holdings · $80.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IXJ: 2026-03-31, VT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXJ and VT?
iShares Global Healthcare ETF (IXJ, by iShares) holds 123 positions; Vanguard Total World Stock Index Fund (VT, by Vanguard) holds 10033. They have 111 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 111IXJ holds 123 · VT holds 10033
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXJ 99%·VT 7%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXJ
12 of 123 positions (0.4% of the fund) are not held by VT.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXJ | VT |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 98.9% | 7.4% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 25.9% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 14.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 10.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 8.3% |
| Other Sectors | 0.7% | 23.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 9.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXJ, 9% of VT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXJ | +0.7% | +5.9% | +25.5% | +7.8% | +4.8% | +8.5% | 1.41% |
| VT | +3.2% | +15.0% | +25.3% | +20.1% | +11.1% | +12.6% | 1.54% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXJ vs VT →
Shared Holdings(111)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by LLY, JNJ and ABBV.
9.44% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
7.63% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
4.98% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
3.25% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
4.02% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
3.87% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
3.96% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
3.72% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
2.51% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
2.45% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
2.29% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
2.17% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
2.37% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
2.12% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
1.55% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
1.64% | 0.11% | 0.11% | |
1.58% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.50% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.50% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
1.49% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.21% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.47% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.41% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.37% | 0.09% | 0.09% | |
1.23% | 0.08% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXJ and VT overlap?
IXJ and VT overlap by 6.7% of portfolio weight. They share 111 holdings (IXJ holds 123 positions and VT holds 10033), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXJ and VT?
The two portfolios are 6.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXJ and VT?
The largest positions held by both funds are LLY, JNJ, ABBV, UNH and AZN. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does IXJ own that VT doesn't?
12 positions (0.4% of IXJ) are unique to IXJ, led by HOLX, SRT3 and DANISH KRONER. In the other direction, 9922 positions (92.7% of VT) are unique to VT.