IXN vs ACWX: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 137 holdings · $8.8B · as of 2026-03-31
ACWXiShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
iShares · 1761 holdings · $11.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (IXN: 2026-03-31, ACWX: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are IXN and ACWX?
iShares Global Tech ETF (IXN, by iShares) holds 137 positions; iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF (ACWX, by iShares) holds 1761. They have 60 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 60IXN holds 137 · ACWX holds 1761
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- IXN 23%·ACWX 16%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in IXN
77 of 137 positions (76.5% of the fund) are not held by ACWX. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | IXN | ACWX |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.1% | 17.5% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 21.6% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 12.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 6.5% |
| Health Care | 0.0% | 6.1% |
| Other Sectors | 0.7% | 23.9% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 11.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of IXN, 11% of ACWX).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| IXN | +3.7% | +34.3% | +47.4% | +33.2% | +19.9% | +24.0% | 0.78% |
| ACWX | +3.0% | +16.6% | +28.7% | +19.1% | +9.3% | +9.6% | 2.46% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in IXN vs ACWX →
Shared Holdings(60)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 005930 and ASML.
4.60% | 4.67% | 4.60% | |
3.39% | 1.95% | 1.95% | |
3.01% | 1.54% | 1.54% | |
1.80% | 1.33% | 1.33% | |
1.01% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.85% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.59% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.51% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.68% | 0.36% | 0.36% | |
0.45% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.43% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.38% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.41% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.34% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.42% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.25% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.24% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.23% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.19% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.20% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.22% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.13% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.16% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.20% | 0.10% | 0.10% | |
0.21% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do IXN and ACWX overlap?
IXN and ACWX overlap by 15.5% of portfolio weight. They share 60 holdings (IXN holds 137 positions and ACWX holds 1761), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both IXN and ACWX?
The two portfolios are 15.5% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of IXN and ACWX?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 005930, ASML, 000660 and SAP. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does IXN own that ACWX doesn't?
77 positions (76.5% of IXN) are unique to IXN, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 1701 positions (84.1% of ACWX) are unique to ACWX.