JGRO vs IWF: Holdings Overlap
JGROJPMorgan Active Growth ETF
JPMorgan · 119 holdings · $9.6B · as of 2026-03-31
IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
iShares · 387 holdings · $127.3B · as of 2026-03-31
How similar are JGRO and IWF?
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO, by JPMorgan) holds 119 positions; iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF (IWF, by iShares) holds 387. They have 80 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 57.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 57.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 80JGRO holds 119 · IWF holds 387
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- JGRO 80%·IWF 78%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in JGRO
39 of 119 positions (17.2% of the fund) are not held by IWF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IWF
307 of 387 positions (21.8% of the fund) are not held by JGRO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | JGRO | IWF |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 37.8% | 49.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 11.4% | 13.1% |
| Health Care | 12.7% | 8.0% |
| Communication Services | 12.5% | 12.4% |
| Industrials | 9.1% | 6.7% |
| Other Sectors | 13.4% | 10.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JGRO | +1.2% | +3.4% | +8.3% | +19.6% | — | — | 0.15% |
| IWF | +2.7% | +5.5% | +13.1% | +22.0% | +12.6% | +17.8% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in JGRO vs IWF →
Shared Holdings(80)
The top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
10.50% | 12.92% | 10.50% | |
8.42% | 11.64% | 8.42% | |
4.85% | 8.82% | 4.85% | |
3.83% | 4.79% | 3.83% | |
3.47% | 3.55% | 3.47% | |
3.45% | 3.46% | 3.45% | |
3.22% | 4.66% | 3.22% | |
6.77% | 2.87% | 2.87% | |
1.83% | 2.66% | 1.83% | |
2.06% | 1.45% | 1.45% | |
0.93% | 1.47% | 0.93% | |
1.11% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
0.68% | 1.06% | 0.68% | |
0.68% | 0.52% | 0.52% | |
0.69% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
0.45% | 0.59% | 0.45% | |
0.43% | 1.39% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.69% | 0.43% | |
0.43% | 0.50% | 0.43% | |
0.52% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.42% | 0.56% | 0.42% | |
0.40% | 0.46% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.89% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.97% | 0.37% | |
0.47% | 0.36% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do JGRO and IWF overlap?
JGRO and IWF overlap by 57.4% of portfolio weight. They share 80 holdings (JGRO holds 119 positions and IWF holds 387), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both JGRO and IWF?
The two portfolios are 57.4% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of JGRO and IWF?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AVGO and TSLA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 76% of the total overlap.
What does JGRO own that IWF doesn't?
39 positions (17.2% of JGRO) are unique to JGRO, led by JNJ, TSM and CIEN. In the other direction, 307 positions (21.8% of IWF) are unique to IWF.