KNG vs NOBL: Holdings Overlap
KNGFT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
First Trust · 69 holdings · $3.5B · as of 2026-04-30
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 69 holdings · $11.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (KNG: 2026-04-30, NOBL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KNG and NOBL?
FT Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG, by First Trust) holds 69 positions; ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL, by ProShares) holds 69. They have 69 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 97.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially interchangeable, so holding both adds little diversification.
- Overlap by Weight
- 97.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 69KNG holds 69 · NOBL holds 69
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KNG 100%·NOBL 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KNG
Every position in KNG is also held by NOBL, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Only in NOBL
Every position in NOBL is also held by KNG, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KNG | NOBL |
|---|---|---|
| Consumer Staples | 23.5% | 23.5% |
| Industrials | 21.8% | 21.8% |
| Financials | 12.7% | 12.7% |
| Materials | 11.5% | 11.5% |
| Health Care | 10.2% | 10.2% |
| Other Sectors | 20.5% | 20.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KNG | +1.6% | +11.1% | +13.7% | +7.8% | +6.0% | — | 8.10% |
| NOBL | +1.6% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +9.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.99% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KNG vs NOBL →
Shared Holdings(69)
The top 10 shared positions account for 16% of the overlap, led by CAT, BEN and WST.
1.62% | 1.60% | 1.60% | |
1.60% | 1.67% | 1.60% | |
1.58% | 1.72% | 1.58% | |
1.58% | 1.76% | 1.58% | |
1.55% | 1.67% | 1.55% | |
1.54% | 1.56% | 1.54% | |
1.53% | 1.55% | 1.53% | |
1.52% | 1.60% | 1.52% | |
1.52% | 1.61% | 1.52% | |
1.51% | 1.58% | 1.51% | |
1.51% | 1.55% | 1.51% | |
1.52% | 1.50% | 1.50% | |
1.50% | 1.56% | 1.50% | |
1.54% | 1.50% | 1.50% | |
1.49% | 1.53% | 1.49% | |
1.49% | 1.58% | 1.49% | |
1.48% | 1.49% | 1.48% | |
1.48% | 1.48% | 1.48% | |
1.50% | 1.48% | 1.48% | |
1.47% | 1.47% | 1.47% | |
1.47% | 1.60% | 1.47% | |
1.47% | 1.46% | 1.46% | |
1.48% | 1.46% | 1.46% | |
1.45% | 1.49% | 1.45% | |
1.45% | 1.58% | 1.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KNG and NOBL overlap?
KNG and NOBL overlap by 97.5% of portfolio weight. They share 69 holdings (KNG holds 69 positions and NOBL holds 69), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KNG and NOBL?
The two portfolios are 97.5% identical by weight. Owning both is largely redundant: they are close to the same portfolio, so a second position mostly duplicates the first.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KNG and NOBL?
The largest positions held by both funds are CAT, BEN, WST, NUE and ADM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 16% of the total overlap.
What does KNG own that NOBL doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in KNG is also held by NOBL. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of NOBL) are unique to NOBL.