KOMP vs MTUM: Holdings Overlap
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (KOMP: 2026-08-06, MTUM: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are KOMP and MTUM?
State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501 positions; iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125. They have 32 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 32KOMP holds 501 · MTUM holds 125
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KOMP 8%·MTUM 40%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KOMP
469 of 501 positions (91.9% of the fund) are not held by MTUM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in MTUM
93 of 125 positions (60.0% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KOMP | MTUM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 29.9% | 44.3% |
| Industrials | 27.4% | 15.6% |
| Health Care | 12.4% | 6.9% |
| Financials | 1.8% | 10.3% |
| Communication Services | 3.6% | 7.4% |
| Other Sectors | 10.4% | 15.4% |
| Unclassified | 14.3% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (14% of KOMP, 0% of MTUM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KOMP vs MTUM →
Shared Holdings(32)
The top 10 shared positions account for 58% of the overlap, led by NVDA, KLAC and MU.
 NVDANVIDIA Corp. COM | 0.77% | 4.64% | 0.77% |
|---|---|---|---|
 KLACKLA Corp. COM NEW | 0.55% | 1.61% | 0.55% |
 MUMicron Technology Inc. COM | 0.40% | 5.56% | 0.40% |
 LMTLockheed Martin Corporation COM | 0.39% | 0.75% | 0.39% |
 JCIJohnson Controls International PLC COM USD1.00 | 0.34% | 0.50% | 0.34% |
 NOCNorthrop Grumman Corporation COM | 0.47% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
 BEBloom Energy Corporation COM CL A | 0.31% | 0.51% | 0.31% |
 RTXRTX Corp. COM | 0.28% | 1.46% | 0.28% |
 AMATApplied Materials Inc. COM | 0.24% | 2.36% | 0.24% |
 GOOGAlphabet Inc. CAP STK CL C | 0.22% | 2.39% | 0.22% |
 LHXL3 Harris Technologies Inc COM | 0.21% | 0.33% | 0.21% |
 GEVGE Vernova Inc. COM | 0.20% | 2.53% | 0.20% |
 APHAmphenol Corporation CL A | 0.19% | 1.55% | 0.19% |
 TELTE Connectivity PLC ORD SHS | 0.19% | 0.32% | 0.19% |
 TERTeradyne Inc. COM | 0.19% | 0.39% | 0.19% |
 COHRCoherent Corp COM | 0.29% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
 GMGeneral Motors Company COM | 0.16% | 0.42% | 0.16% |
 NRGNRG Energy, Inc. COM NEW | 0.16% | 0.26% | 0.16% |
 ADIAnalog Devices Inc. COM | 0.15% | 1.02% | 0.15% |
 CMICummins Inc. COM | 0.13% | 0.67% | 0.13% |
 GLWCorning Incorporated COM | 0.12% | 1.22% | 0.12% |
 ROKRockwell Automation, Inc. COM | 0.50% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 AVGOBroadcom Inc COM | 0.12% | 5.40% | 0.12% |
 RKLBRocket Lab Corp. COM | 0.27% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
 MCKMckesson Corp. COM | 0.10% | 0.64% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KOMP and MTUM overlap?
KOMP and MTUM overlap by 6.6% of portfolio weight. They share 32 holdings (KOMP holds 501 positions and MTUM holds 125), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KOMP and MTUM?
The two portfolios are 6.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KOMP and MTUM?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, KLAC, MU, LMT and JCI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 58% of the total overlap.
What does KOMP own that MTUM doesn't?
469 positions (91.9% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP, led by DDD, TWST and ESLT. In the other direction, 93 positions (60.0% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM.