KOMP vs SPEM: Holdings Overlap
KOMPState Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 501 holdings · $2.6B · as of 2026-08-06
SPEMState Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 2776 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-08-06
How similar are KOMP and SPEM?
State Street® SPDR® S&P Kensho New Economies Composite ETF (KOMP, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 501 positions; State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 2776. They have 15 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 15KOMP holds 501 · SPEM holds 2776
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- KOMP 3%·SPEM 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in KOMP
486 of 501 positions (96.9% of the fund) are not held by SPEM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SPEM
2761 of 2776 positions (108.2% of the fund) are not held by KOMP. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | KOMP | SPEM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 29.9% | 25.3% |
| Industrials | 27.4% | 1.5% |
| Financials | 1.8% | 15.1% |
| Health Care | 12.4% | 1.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 4.3% | 7.0% |
| Other Sectors | 9.7% | 15.2% |
| Unclassified | 14.3% | 43.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (14% of KOMP, 40% of SPEM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KOMP | +3.5% | +18.5% | +29.5% | +17.6% | +3.3% | — | 1.47% |
| SPEM | +2.8% | +13.1% | +22.8% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +8.6% | 2.48% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in KOMP vs SPEM →
Shared Holdings(15)
The top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the overlap, led by CIG, NIO and JOYY.
0.31% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.28% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.06% | 0.06% | 0.06% | |
0.04% | 0.04% | 0.04% | |
0.03% | 0.38% | 0.03% | |
0.99% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
0.18% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.03% | 0.02% | 0.02% | |
0.03% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.16% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.26% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.17% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do KOMP and SPEM overlap?
KOMP and SPEM overlap by 0.4% of portfolio weight. They share 15 holdings (KOMP holds 501 positions and SPEM holds 2776), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both KOMP and SPEM?
The two portfolios are 0.4% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of KOMP and SPEM?
The largest positions held by both funds are CIG, NIO, JOYY, TME and NU. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 94% of the total overlap.
What does KOMP own that SPEM doesn't?
486 positions (96.9% of KOMP) are unique to KOMP, led by DDD, TWST and ESLT. In the other direction, 2761 positions (108.2% of SPEM) are unique to SPEM.