LIT vs VWO: Holdings Overlap
LITGlobal X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF
Global X · 41 holdings · $1.5B · as of 2026-04-30
VWOVanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund
Vanguard · 5015 holdings · $124.9B · as of 2026-04-30
How similar are LIT and VWO?
Global X Lithium and Battery Tech ETF (LIT, by Global X) holds 41 positions; Vanguard Emerging Markets Stock Index Fund (VWO, by Vanguard) holds 5015. They have 13 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 13LIT holds 41 · VWO holds 5015
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- LIT 35%·VWO 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in LIT
28 of 41 positions (65.3% of the fund) are not held by VWO.
Only in VWO
5002 of 5015 positions (98.5% of the fund) are not held by LIT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | LIT | VWO |
|---|---|---|
| Materials | 41.6% | 3.4% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 23.7% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 12.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.6% | 7.0% |
| Industrials | 8.5% | 1.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 13.3% |
| Unclassified | 26.3% | 37.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (26% of LIT, 38% of VWO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIT | +0.3% | +14.6% | +73.8% | +6.5% | -2.3% | +13.0% | 0.68% |
| VWO | +2.7% | +12.6% | +22.3% | +16.6% | +6.6% | +7.9% | 2.29% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in LIT vs VWO →
Shared Holdings(13)
The top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the overlap, led by 1211RUB, 300750 and 002371.
2.59% | 0.42% | 0.42% | |
3.36% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
3.70% | 0.03% | 0.03% | |
4.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
3.91% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
3.38% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
2.91% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.86% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.53% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
2.62% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
2.18% | 0.01% | 0.01% | |
1.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | |
0.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do LIT and VWO overlap?
LIT and VWO overlap by 0.7% of portfolio weight. They share 13 holdings (LIT holds 41 positions and VWO holds 5015), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both LIT and VWO?
The two portfolios are 0.7% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of LIT and VWO?
The largest positions held by both funds are 1211RUB, 300750, 002371, 002460 and SQM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does LIT own that VWO doesn't?
28 positions (65.3% of LIT) are unique to LIT, led by RIO, 006400 and ALB. In the other direction, 5002 positions (98.5% of VWO) are unique to VWO.