MCHI vs AAXJ: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
AAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
iShares · 916 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (MCHI: 2026-05-31, AAXJ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MCHI and AAXJ?
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580 positions; iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF (AAXJ, by iShares) holds 916. They have 458 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 25.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 25.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 458MCHI holds 580 · AAXJ holds 916
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MCHI 97%·AAXJ 26%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MCHI
122 of 580 positions (2.6% of the fund) are not held by AAXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MCHI | AAXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 7.8% | 39.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.1% | 8.1% |
| Communication Services | 17.2% | 6.4% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 13.9% |
| Industrials | 1.6% | 3.5% |
| Other Sectors | 8.5% | 8.1% |
| Unclassified | 28.5% | 20.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (29% of MCHI, 20% of AAXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
| AAXJ | -0.6% | +22.4% | +35.6% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +8.9% | 1.36% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MCHI vs AAXJ →
Shared Holdings(458)
The top 10 shared positions account for 43% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and C6T.
13.21% | 3.70% | 3.70% | |
10.14% | 2.70% | 2.70% | |
3.97% | 1.03% | 1.03% | |
2.28% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
2.35% | 0.62% | 0.62% | |
2.10% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
1.96% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.84% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
1.63% | 0.46% | 0.46% | |
1.80% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.63% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
1.31% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
1.44% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.11% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
1.12% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
1.05% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.97% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.90% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.77% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.74% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.74% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.60% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.64% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.59% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.60% | 0.16% | 0.16% |
Showing the top 250 of 458 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MCHI and AAXJ overlap?
MCHI and AAXJ overlap by 25.9% of portfolio weight. They share 458 holdings (MCHI holds 580 positions and AAXJ holds 916), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MCHI and AAXJ?
The two portfolios are 25.9% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MCHI and AAXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, C6T, PDD and 1810. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 43% of the total overlap.
What does MCHI own that AAXJ doesn't?
122 positions (2.6% of MCHI) are unique to MCHI, led by 301308, 600487 and 002281. In the other direction, 458 positions (73.8% of AAXJ) are unique to AAXJ.