MCHI vs EEM: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 580 holdings · $6.3B · as of 2026-05-31
EEMiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
iShares · 1246 holdings · $30.2B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are MCHI and EEM?
iShares MSCI China ETF (MCHI, by iShares) holds 580 positions; iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (EEM, by iShares) holds 1246. They have 580 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 20.4% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 20.4%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 580MCHI holds 580 · EEM holds 1246
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MCHI 100%·EEM 20%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MCHI
Every position in MCHI is also held by EEM, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Only in EEM
666 of 1246 positions (79.5% of the fund) are not held by MCHI. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MCHI | EEM |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 7.8% | 41.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 21.1% | 6.8% |
| Communication Services | 17.2% | 5.3% |
| Financials | 14.8% | 12.6% |
| Materials | 1.8% | 3.3% |
| Other Sectors | 8.3% | 9.3% |
| Unclassified | 28.5% | 21.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (29% of MCHI, 22% of EEM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCHI | +9.3% | -5.2% | -1.0% | +8.7% | -2.2% | +4.3% | 1.94% |
| EEM | -0.1% | +20.6% | +35.3% | +20.3% | +7.3% | +8.4% | 1.70% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MCHI vs EEM →
Shared Holdings(580)
The top 10 shared positions account for 42% of the overlap, led by 700, 9988 and C6T.
13.21% | 2.71% | 2.71% | |
10.14% | 2.08% | 2.08% | |
3.97% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
2.35% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
2.28% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
2.10% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
1.96% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
1.84% | 0.38% | 0.38% | |
1.80% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
1.63% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.63% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
1.44% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
1.31% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
1.12% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.11% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
1.05% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.97% | 0.20% | 0.20% | |
0.94% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.90% | 0.18% | 0.18% | |
0.77% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.74% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.74% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.64% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.59% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.60% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Showing the top 250 of 580 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MCHI and EEM overlap?
MCHI and EEM overlap by 20.4% of portfolio weight. They share 580 holdings (MCHI holds 580 positions and EEM holds 1246), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MCHI and EEM?
The two portfolios are 20.4% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MCHI and EEM?
The largest positions held by both funds are 700, 9988, C6T, 1810 and PDD. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 42% of the total overlap.
What does MCHI own that EEM doesn't?
Nothing. Every position in MCHI is also held by EEM. In the other direction, 666 positions (79.5% of EEM) are unique to EEM.