MTUM vs OMFL: Holdings Overlap
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
OMFLInvesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF
Invesco · 478 holdings · $4.8B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (MTUM: 2026-04-30, OMFL: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MTUM and OMFL?
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125 positions; Invesco Russell 1000 Dynamic Multifactor ETF (OMFL, by Invesco) holds 478. They have 79 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 27.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 27.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 79MTUM holds 125 · OMFL holds 478
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MTUM 73%·OMFL 35%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MTUM
46 of 125 positions (26.8% of the fund) are not held by OMFL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MTUM | OMFL |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 44.3% | 33.6% |
| Industrials | 15.6% | 9.7% |
| Communication Services | 7.4% | 11.2% |
| Financials | 10.3% | 11.1% |
| Health Care | 6.9% | 9.8% |
| Other Sectors | 15.4% | 24.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
| OMFL | +3.5% | +17.0% | +23.0% | +13.4% | +9.8% | — | 0.78% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MTUM vs OMFL →
Shared Holdings(79)
The top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the overlap, led by NVDA, GOOGL and GOOG.
4.64% | 5.05% | 4.64% | |
2.94% | 4.38% | 2.94% | |
2.39% | 3.53% | 2.39% | |
5.56% | 2.37% | 2.37% | |
3.61% | 2.17% | 2.17% | |
2.36% | 1.19% | 1.19% | |
2.75% | 1.10% | 1.10% | |
1.61% | 0.97% | 0.97% | |
0.90% | 1.11% | 0.90% | |
5.40% | 0.86% | 0.86% | |
1.54% | 0.77% | 0.77% | |
3.76% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
1.17% | 0.70% | 0.70% | |
0.64% | 1.81% | 0.64% | |
2.53% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.35% | 0.83% | 0.35% | |
0.31% | 0.69% | 0.31% | |
0.31% | 0.28% | 0.28% | |
1.03% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.82% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.25% | 0.58% | 0.25% | |
0.24% | 0.35% | 0.24% | |
0.39% | 0.24% | 0.24% | |
0.39% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
3.21% | 0.18% | 0.18% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MTUM and OMFL overlap?
MTUM and OMFL overlap by 27.7% of portfolio weight. They share 79 holdings (MTUM holds 125 positions and OMFL holds 478), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MTUM and OMFL?
The two portfolios are 27.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MTUM and OMFL?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, GOOGL, GOOG, MU and LRCX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 70% of the total overlap.
What does MTUM own that OMFL doesn't?
46 positions (26.8% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM, led by INTC, JPM and GE. In the other direction, 399 positions (64.6% of OMFL) are unique to OMFL.