MTUM vs VFLO: Holdings Overlap
MTUMiShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF
iShares · 125 holdings · $26.3B · as of 2026-04-30
VFLOVictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF
VictoryShares · 50 holdings · $9.6B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (MTUM: 2026-04-30, VFLO: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are MTUM and VFLO?
iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF (MTUM, by iShares) holds 125 positions; VictoryShares Free Cash Flow ETF (VFLO, by VictoryShares) holds 50. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7MTUM holds 125 · VFLO holds 50
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- MTUM 2%·VFLO 15%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in MTUM
118 of 125 positions (97.7% of the fund) are not held by VFLO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | MTUM | VFLO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 44.3% | 30.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.6% | 17.9% |
| Health Care | 6.9% | 17.6% |
| Industrials | 15.6% | 10.1% |
| Energy | 3.5% | 12.8% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 11.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MTUM | -1.0% | +23.8% | +27.7% | +29.4% | +12.8% | +16.1% | 0.60% |
| VFLO | +8.6% | +31.3% | +51.6% | +26.1% | — | — | 1.09% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in MTUM vs VFLO →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by NEM, GM and NRG.
 NEMNewmont Corporation COM | 1.17% | 2.55% | 1.17% |
|---|---|---|---|
 GMGeneral Motors Company COM | 0.42% | 2.47% | 0.42% |
 NRGNRG Energy, Inc. COM NEW | 0.26% | 1.67% | 0.26% |
 FOXAFox Corporation CL A COM | 0.11% | 1.45% | 0.11% |
 RPRXRoyalty Pharma PLC COM USD0.0001 CLASS A | 0.06% | 2.35% | 0.06% |
 EXPEExpedia Group Inc COM NEW | 0.06% | 2.70% | 0.06% |
 EQTEQT Corporation COM | 0.05% | 1.68% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do MTUM and VFLO overlap?
MTUM and VFLO overlap by 2.1% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (MTUM holds 125 positions and VFLO holds 50), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both MTUM and VFLO?
The two portfolios are 2.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of MTUM and VFLO?
The largest positions held by both funds are NEM, GM, NRG, FOXA and RPRX. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does MTUM own that VFLO doesn't?
118 positions (97.7% of MTUM) are unique to MTUM, led by MU, AVGO and NVDA. In the other direction, 43 positions (84.6% of VFLO) are unique to VFLO.