NOBL vs RSPH: Holdings Overlap
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 69 holdings · $11.9B · as of 2026-05-31
RSPHInvesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF
Invesco · 59 holdings · $776M · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (NOBL: 2026-05-31, RSPH: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are NOBL and RSPH?
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL, by ProShares) holds 69 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight Health Care ETF (RSPH, by Invesco) holds 59. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7NOBL holds 69 · RSPH holds 59
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- NOBL 10%·RSPH 12%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in NOBL
62 of 69 positions (89.5% of the fund) are not held by RSPH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | NOBL | RSPH |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 10.2% | 100.5% |
| Consumer Staples | 23.5% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 21.8% | 0.0% |
| Financials | 12.7% | 0.0% |
| Materials | 11.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 20.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOBL | +1.6% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +9.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.99% |
| RSPH | +3.0% | +12.0% | +28.4% | +7.0% | +3.5% | +8.9% | 0.65% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in NOBL vs RSPH →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by WST, ABBV and JNJ.
1.72% | 2.22% | 1.72% | |
1.56% | 1.65% | 1.56% | |
1.46% | 1.68% | 1.46% | |
1.41% | 1.59% | 1.41% | |
1.38% | 1.62% | 1.38% | |
1.35% | 1.46% | 1.35% | |
1.32% | 1.62% | 1.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do NOBL and RSPH overlap?
NOBL and RSPH overlap by 10.2% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (NOBL holds 69 positions and RSPH holds 59), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both NOBL and RSPH?
The two portfolios are 10.2% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of NOBL and RSPH?
The largest positions held by both funds are WST, ABBV, JNJ, CAH and BDX. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does NOBL own that RSPH doesn't?
62 positions (89.5% of NOBL) are unique to NOBL, led by NUE, IBM and ADM. In the other direction, 52 positions (88.6% of RSPH) are unique to RSPH.