NOBL vs VOT: Holdings Overlap
NOBLProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
ProShares · 69 holdings · $11.9B · as of 2026-05-31
VOTVanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund
Vanguard · 130 holdings · $19.9B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (NOBL: 2026-05-31, VOT: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are NOBL and VOT?
ProShares S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (NOBL, by ProShares) holds 69 positions; Vanguard Mid-cap Growth Index Fund (VOT, by Vanguard) holds 130. They have 7 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 7NOBL holds 69 · VOT holds 130
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- NOBL 10%·VOT 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in NOBL
62 of 69 positions (89.5% of the fund) are not held by VOT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in VOT
123 of 130 positions (93.5% of the fund) are not held by NOBL. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | NOBL | VOT |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 21.8% | 25.1% |
| Consumer Staples | 23.5% | 0.8% |
| Information Technology | 3.0% | 22.5% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 3.9% | 15.2% |
| Financials | 12.7% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 34.8% | 27.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NOBL | +1.6% | +13.4% | +15.9% | +9.0% | +6.9% | +10.0% | 1.99% |
| VOT | +1.9% | +10.1% | +7.1% | +14.7% | +5.4% | +11.9% | 0.59% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in NOBL vs VOT →
Shared Holdings(7)
The top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by O, FAST and GWW.
 ORealty Income Corporation COM | 1.40% | 1.48% | 1.40% |
|---|---|---|---|
 FASTFastenal Co. COM | 1.42% | 1.39% | 1.39% |
 GWWW.w. Grainger Inc. COM | 1.54% | 1.28% | 1.28% |
 CTASCintas Corporation COM | 1.42% | 0.75% | 0.75% |
 CHDChurch & Dwight Co Inc. COM | 1.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% |
 BROBrown & Brown Inc COM | 1.20% | 0.49% | 0.49% |
 WSTWest Pharmaceutical Services Incorporated COM | 1.72% | 0.47% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do NOBL and VOT overlap?
NOBL and VOT overlap by 6.3% of portfolio weight. They share 7 holdings (NOBL holds 69 positions and VOT holds 130), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both NOBL and VOT?
The two portfolios are 6.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of NOBL and VOT?
The largest positions held by both funds are O, FAST, GWW, CTAS and CHD. Together the top 7 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does NOBL own that VOT doesn't?
62 positions (89.5% of NOBL) are unique to NOBL, led by NUE, IBM and ADM. In the other direction, 123 positions (93.5% of VOT) are unique to VOT.