OEF vs XLG: Holdings Overlap
iShares · 101 holdings · $20.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Invesco · 51 holdings · $10.7B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (OEF: 2026-03-31, XLG: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are OEF and XLG?
iShares S&P 100 ETF (OEF, by iShares) holds 101 positions; Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG, by Invesco) holds 51. They have 51 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 82.5% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 82.5%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 51OEF holds 101 · XLG holds 51
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- OEF 83%·XLG 100%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in OEF
50 of 101 positions (17.2% of the fund) are not held by XLG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in XLG
Every position in XLG is also held by OEF, so it brings nothing the other fund doesn’t already own.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | OEF | XLG |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 38.9% | 43.7% |
| Communication Services | 13.5% | 17.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.2% | 11.3% |
| Financials | 11.2% | 9.6% |
| Health Care | 9.3% | 7.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.7% | 11.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OEF | +4.0% | +12.2% | +23.1% | +23.3% | +14.9% | +16.5% | 0.84% |
| XLG | +3.7% | +7.2% | +17.9% | +22.2% | +14.3% | +16.6% | 0.63% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in OEF vs XLG →
Shared Holdings(51)
The top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT.
10.50% | 13.04% | 10.50% | |
9.23% | 10.71% | 9.23% | |
6.81% | 8.14% | 6.81% | |
5.04% | 6.96% | 5.04% | |
4.15% | 6.03% | 4.15% | |
3.63% | 4.83% | 3.63% | |
3.32% | 4.80% | 3.32% | |
3.10% | 3.60% | 3.10% | |
2.59% | 2.89% | 2.59% | |
2.18% | 2.34% | 2.18% | |
1.96% | 2.27% | 1.96% | |
1.81% | 1.99% | 1.81% | |
1.76% | 1.73% | 1.73% | |
1.46% | 1.49% | 1.46% | |
1.35% | 1.56% | 1.35% | |
1.26% | 1.49% | 1.26% | |
1.10% | 1.21% | 1.10% | |
1.01% | 1.10% | 1.01% | |
1.01% | 1.06% | 1.01% | |
0.96% | 0.97% | 0.96% | |
0.95% | 1.00% | 0.95% | |
0.83% | 0.92% | 0.83% | |
0.83% | 0.85% | 0.83% | |
0.82% | 1.55% | 0.82% | |
0.82% | 1.11% | 0.82% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do OEF and XLG overlap?
OEF and XLG overlap by 82.5% of portfolio weight. They share 51 holdings (OEF holds 101 positions and XLG holds 51), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both OEF and XLG?
The two portfolios are 82.5% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of OEF and XLG?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AAPL, MSFT, AMZN and GOOGL. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 61% of the total overlap.
What does OEF own that XLG doesn't?
50 positions (17.2% of OEF) are unique to OEF, led by MU, AMAT and LRCX. In the other direction, 0 positions (0.0% of XLG) are unique to XLG.