QQEW vs CGGR: Holdings Overlap
QQEWFirst Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF
First Trust · 51 holdings · $1.8B · as of 2026-03-31
Capital Group · 88 holdings · $23.9B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (QQEW: 2026-03-31, CGGR: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are QQEW and CGGR?
First Trust Nasdaq-100 Select Equal Weight ETF (QQEW, by First Trust) holds 51 positions; Capital Group Growth ETF (CGGR, by Capital Group) holds 88. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 23.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 23.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18QQEW holds 51 · CGGR holds 88
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- QQEW 34%·CGGR 45%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in QQEW
33 of 51 positions (66.1% of the fund) are not held by CGGR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | QQEW | CGGR |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.6% | 36.0% |
| Communication Services | 10.0% | 17.0% |
| Health Care | 16.3% | 9.2% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.4% | 13.9% |
| Industrials | 7.7% | 7.9% |
| Other Sectors | 3.9% | 14.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQEW | +2.5% | +14.0% | +19.6% | +14.5% | +7.7% | +14.2% | 0.20% |
| CGGR | +0.6% | +5.7% | +12.8% | +22.4% | — | — | 0.15% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in QQEW vs CGGR →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and MSFT.
2.06% | 5.16% | 2.06% | |
2.03% | 5.40% | 2.03% | |
1.98% | 4.37% | 1.98% | |
1.97% | 7.09% | 1.97% | |
2.14% | 1.85% | 1.85% | |
2.09% | 1.79% | 1.79% | |
1.97% | 1.68% | 1.68% | |
1.63% | 4.86% | 1.63% | |
2.01% | 1.56% | 1.56% | |
2.01% | 1.17% | 1.17% | |
0.98% | 3.36% | 0.98% | |
0.98% | 3.06% | 0.98% | |
2.05% | 0.83% | 0.83% | |
2.16% | 0.76% | 0.76% | |
1.84% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
2.07% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
1.96% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
1.92% | 0.23% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do QQEW and CGGR overlap?
QQEW and CGGR overlap by 23.1% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (QQEW holds 51 positions and CGGR holds 88), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both QQEW and CGGR?
The two portfolios are 23.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of QQEW and CGGR?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, MSFT, META and NFLX. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does QQEW own that CGGR doesn't?
33 positions (66.1% of QQEW) are unique to QQEW, led by ARM, PDD and MELI. In the other direction, 70 positions (53.2% of CGGR) are unique to CGGR.