QQQI vs CGDV: Holdings Overlap
QQQINEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF
NEOS · 101 holdings · $13.9B · as of 2026-03-31
CGDVCapital Group Dividend Value ETF
Capital Group · 52 holdings · $37.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (QQQI: 2026-03-31, CGDV: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are QQQI and CGDV?
NEOS Nasdaq-100(R) High Income ETF (QQQI, by NEOS) holds 101 positions; Capital Group Dividend Value ETF (CGDV, by Capital Group) holds 52. They have 19 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 35.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 35.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 19QQQI holds 101 · CGDV holds 52
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- QQQI 47%·CGDV 47%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in QQQI
82 of 101 positions (52.0% of the fund) are not held by CGDV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | QQQI | CGDV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 49.3% | 34.4% |
| Communication Services | 15.9% | 8.7% |
| Industrials | 4.1% | 13.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.5% | 7.9% |
| Health Care | 5.0% | 9.9% |
| Other Sectors | 12.2% | 24.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QQQI | +1.3% | +11.3% | +20.0% | — | — | — | 13.81% |
| CGDV | +4.9% | +18.2% | +28.6% | +24.3% | — | — | 1.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in QQQI vs CGDV →
Shared Holdings(19)
The top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and GOOGL.
8.64% | 5.66% | 5.66% | |
5.62% | 5.81% | 5.62% | |
3.41% | 3.59% | 3.41% | |
3.42% | 3.33% | 3.33% | |
2.98% | 5.16% | 2.98% | |
7.67% | 2.36% | 2.36% | |
4.54% | 1.88% | 1.88% | |
1.72% | 3.02% | 1.72% | |
1.53% | 3.12% | 1.53% | |
1.30% | 1.95% | 1.30% | |
1.18% | 1.09% | 1.09% | |
0.99% | 1.21% | 0.99% | |
1.06% | 0.79% | 0.79% | |
0.63% | 0.80% | 0.63% | |
0.58% | 1.75% | 0.58% | |
0.57% | 2.26% | 0.57% | |
0.47% | 1.42% | 0.47% | |
0.41% | 0.79% | 0.41% | |
0.32% | 0.81% | 0.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do QQQI and CGDV overlap?
QQQI and CGDV overlap by 35.6% of portfolio weight. They share 19 holdings (QQQI holds 101 positions and CGDV holds 52), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both QQQI and CGDV?
The two portfolios are 35.6% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of QQQI and CGDV?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, GOOGL, META and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 84% of the total overlap.
What does QQQI own that CGDV doesn't?
82 positions (52.0% of QQQI) are unique to QQQI, led by TSLA, WMT and GOOG. In the other direction, 33 positions (51.1% of CGDV) are unique to CGDV.