SCHG vs IVW: Holdings Overlap
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
iShares · 143 holdings · $77.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (SCHG: 2026-05-31, IVW: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCHG and IVW?
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193 positions; iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF (IVW, by iShares) holds 143. They have 70 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 66.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is heavily overlapping, with largely the same stocks driving both funds.
- Overlap by Weight
- 66.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 70SCHG holds 193 · IVW holds 143
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCHG 83%·IVW 76%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCHG
123 of 193 positions (16.8% of the fund) are not held by IVW. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IVW
73 of 143 positions (24.2% of the fund) are not held by SCHG. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SCHG | IVW |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 45.9% | 47.7% |
| Communication Services | 15.3% | 16.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 12.3% | 9.4% |
| Financials | 6.8% | 9.8% |
| Health Care | 8.4% | 6.8% |
| Other Sectors | 11.2% | 9.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
| IVW | +4.4% | +15.5% | +25.3% | +26.7% | +14.0% | +17.7% | 0.35% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCHG vs IVW →
Shared Holdings(70)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by NVDA, MSFT and AAPL.
11.01% | 14.62% | 11.01% | |
7.17% | 9.48% | 7.17% | |
9.83% | 6.43% | 6.43% | |
4.75% | 5.78% | 4.75% | |
4.55% | 5.06% | 4.55% | |
3.78% | 4.63% | 3.78% | |
5.67% | 3.72% | 3.72% | |
3.45% | 4.32% | 3.45% | |
3.05% | 2.51% | 2.51% | |
3.91% | 2.24% | 2.24% | |
1.27% | 1.40% | 1.27% | |
1.25% | 1.15% | 1.15% | |
2.93% | 1.14% | 1.14% | |
1.92% | 0.96% | 0.96% | |
1.40% | 0.94% | 0.94% | |
0.91% | 0.81% | 0.81% | |
0.88% | 0.67% | 0.67% | |
1.18% | 0.53% | 0.53% | |
0.53% | 0.56% | 0.53% | |
0.51% | 0.51% | 0.51% | |
0.47% | 0.47% | 0.47% | |
0.57% | 0.44% | 0.44% | |
0.58% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.64% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.42% | 0.33% | 0.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCHG and IVW overlap?
SCHG and IVW overlap by 66.3% of portfolio weight. They share 70 holdings (SCHG holds 193 positions and IVW holds 143), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCHG and IVW?
The two portfolios are 66.3% identical by weight. Owning both mostly doubles down on the shared core rather than diversifying: the same large positions drive both funds.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCHG and IVW?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, MSFT, AAPL, GOOGL and AVGO. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does SCHG own that IVW doesn't?
123 positions (16.8% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG, led by COST, UNH and LIN. In the other direction, 73 positions (24.2% of IVW) are unique to IVW.