SCHG vs VTV: Holdings Overlap
SCHGSchwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Schwab · 193 holdings · $62.4B · as of 2026-05-31
Vanguard · 311 holdings · $191.4B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (SCHG: 2026-05-31, VTV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCHG and VTV?
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG, by Schwab) holds 193 positions; Vanguard Value Index Fund (VTV, by Vanguard) holds 311. They have 37 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 37SCHG holds 193 · VTV holds 311
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCHG 11%·VTV 11%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCHG
156 of 193 positions (88.5% of the fund) are not held by VTV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SCHG | VTV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 45.9% | 9.9% |
| Financials | 6.8% | 21.9% |
| Communication Services | 15.3% | 3.5% |
| Health Care | 8.4% | 15.3% |
| Industrials | 6.6% | 14.4% |
| Other Sectors | 17.0% | 33.8% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 0.6% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of SCHG, 1% of VTV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHG | +4.3% | +9.9% | +19.1% | +24.1% | +14.0% | +18.6% | 0.37% |
| VTV | +2.2% | +18.7% | +29.5% | +18.0% | +12.5% | +12.6% | 1.82% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCHG vs VTV →
Shared Holdings(37)
The top 10 shared positions account for 59% of the overlap, led by UNH, LIN and TMO.
1.20% | 1.00% | 1.00% | |
0.81% | 0.94% | 0.81% | |
0.65% | 0.75% | 0.65% | |
0.63% | 0.70% | 0.63% | |
1.18% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.52% | 0.55% | 0.52% | |
0.40% | 0.49% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.48% | 0.39% | |
0.37% | 0.46% | 0.37% | |
0.35% | 0.38% | 0.35% | |
0.62% | 0.34% | 0.34% | |
0.32% | 0.43% | 0.32% | |
0.31% | 0.35% | 0.31% | |
0.45% | 0.25% | 0.25% | |
0.25% | 0.30% | 0.25% | |
0.23% | 0.25% | 0.23% | |
0.22% | 0.25% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.25% | 0.22% | |
0.22% | 0.33% | 0.22% | |
0.31% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.22% | 0.19% | 0.19% | |
0.17% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.12% | 0.15% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.12% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.11% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCHG and VTV overlap?
SCHG and VTV overlap by 9.7% of portfolio weight. They share 37 holdings (SCHG holds 193 positions and VTV holds 311), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCHG and VTV?
The two portfolios are 9.7% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCHG and VTV?
The largest positions held by both funds are UNH, LIN, TMO, DIS and GE. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 59% of the total overlap.
What does SCHG own that VTV doesn't?
156 positions (88.5% of SCHG) are unique to SCHG, led by NVDA, AAPL and MSFT. In the other direction, 274 positions (88.5% of VTV) are unique to VTV.