SCHM vs VBR: Holdings Overlap
Schwab · 496 holdings · $15.1B · as of 2026-05-31
VBRVanguard Small-cap Value Index Fund
Vanguard · 838 holdings · $38.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (SCHM: 2026-05-31, VBR: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCHM and VBR?
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM, by Schwab) holds 496 positions; Vanguard Small-cap Value Index Fund (VBR, by Vanguard) holds 838. They have 298 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 49.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 49.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 298SCHM holds 496 · VBR holds 838
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCHM 53%·VBR 60%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCHM
198 of 496 positions (46.9% of the fund) are not held by VBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SCHM | VBR |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 22.5% | 18.8% |
| Information Technology | 20.2% | 8.2% |
| Financials | 11.7% | 18.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.5% | 10.9% |
| Health Care | 10.8% | 8.4% |
| Other Sectors | 25.0% | 34.3% |
| Unclassified | 0.2% | 0.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of SCHM, 1% of VBR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | +1.6% | +20.7% | +28.9% | +15.8% | +8.2% | +11.2% | 1.22% |
| VBR | +3.1% | +19.2% | +28.7% | +15.4% | +10.0% | +10.8% | 1.73% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCHM vs VBR →
Shared Holdings(298)
The top 10 shared positions account for 9% of the overlap, led by FLEX, TPR and UTHR.
1.03% | 0.58% | 0.58% | |
0.55% | 0.69% | 0.55% | |
0.44% | 0.63% | 0.44% | |
0.42% | 0.57% | 0.42% | |
0.40% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.40% | 0.40% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.48% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.39% | 0.38% | |
0.40% | 0.37% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.42% | 0.37% | |
0.37% | 0.38% | 0.37% | |
0.35% | 0.38% | 0.35% | |
0.33% | 0.49% | 0.33% | |
0.32% | 0.48% | 0.32% | |
0.33% | 0.32% | 0.32% | |
0.31% | 0.36% | 0.31% | |
0.31% | 0.40% | 0.31% | |
0.31% | 0.48% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.44% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.37% | 0.30% | |
0.66% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.37% | 0.30% | |
0.36% | 0.30% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.37% | 0.30% | |
0.29% | 0.34% | 0.29% |
Showing the top 250 of 298 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCHM and VBR overlap?
SCHM and VBR overlap by 49.3% of portfolio weight. They share 298 holdings (SCHM holds 496 positions and VBR holds 838), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCHM and VBR?
The two portfolios are 49.3% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCHM and VBR?
The largest positions held by both funds are FLEX, TPR, UTHR, OMC and AKAM. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 9% of the total overlap.
What does SCHM own that VBR doesn't?
198 positions (46.9% of SCHM) are unique to SCHM, led by SNDK, CIEN and BE. In the other direction, 540 positions (39.7% of VBR) are unique to VBR.