SCHM vs XSD: Holdings Overlap
Schwab · 496 holdings · $15.1B · as of 2026-05-31
XSDState Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 46 holdings · $2.9B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 67 days apart (SCHM: 2026-05-31, XSD: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCHM and XSD?
Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM, by Schwab) holds 496 positions; State Street® SPDR® S&P® Semiconductor ETF (XSD, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 46. They have 9 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 2.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 2.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 9SCHM holds 496 · XSD holds 46
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCHM 2%·XSD 21%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCHM
487 of 496 positions (97.9% of the fund) are not held by XSD. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SCHM | XSD |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 20.2% | 95.2% |
| Industrials | 22.5% | 1.8% |
| Financials | 11.7% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 10.8% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 25.0% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.2% | 2.9% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of SCHM, 3% of XSD).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHM | +1.6% | +20.7% | +28.9% | +15.8% | +8.2% | +11.2% | 1.22% |
| XSD | +1.8% | +69.5% | +104.0% | +35.6% | +22.7% | +27.6% | 0.14% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCHM vs XSD →
Shared Holdings(9)
The top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by MTSI, LSCC and RMBS.
0.44% | 2.19% | 0.44% | |
0.37% | 2.49% | 0.37% | |
0.29% | 1.82% | 0.29% | |
0.22% | 2.44% | 0.22% | |
0.16% | 2.58% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 2.01% | 0.16% | |
0.13% | 2.29% | 0.13% | |
0.11% | 2.45% | 0.11% | |
0.08% | 2.56% | 0.08% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCHM and XSD overlap?
SCHM and XSD overlap by 2.0% of portfolio weight. They share 9 holdings (SCHM holds 496 positions and XSD holds 46), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCHM and XSD?
The two portfolios are 2.0% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCHM and XSD?
The largest positions held by both funds are MTSI, LSCC, RMBS, SWKS and QRVO. Together the top 9 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does SCHM own that XSD doesn't?
487 positions (97.9% of SCHM) are unique to SCHM, led by SNDK, CIEN and BE. In the other direction, 37 positions (79.2% of XSD) are unique to XSD.