SCZ vs FNDC: Holdings Overlap
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
FNDCSchwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF
Schwab · 1580 holdings · $3.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (SCZ: 2026-04-30, FNDC: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCZ and FNDC?
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044 positions; Schwab Fundamental International Small Equity ETF (FNDC, by Schwab) holds 1580. They have 1037 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 43.2% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 43.2%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1037SCZ holds 2044 · FNDC holds 1580
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCZ 57%·FNDC 61%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCZ
1007 of 2044 positions (41.8% of the fund) are not held by FNDC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
| FNDC | +4.3% | +15.1% | +22.5% | +18.2% | +8.5% | +9.0% | 3.53% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCZ vs FNDC →
Shared Holdings(1037)
The top 10 shared positions account for 4% of the overlap, led by PLS, IGG and 522.
0.39% | 0.22% | 0.22% | |
0.19% | 0.21% | 0.19% | |
0.18% | 0.26% | 0.18% | |
0.19% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.26% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.17% | 0.16% | |
0.19% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.16% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.21% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.23% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.17% | 0.14% | |
0.17% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.16% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.17% | 0.14% | |
0.29% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.21% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.16% | 0.13% | |
0.15% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.16% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.17% | 0.13% | |
0.14% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.15% | 0.12% | |
0.12% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.19% | 0.12% | 0.12% |
Showing the top 250 of 1037 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCZ and FNDC overlap?
SCZ and FNDC overlap by 43.2% of portfolio weight. They share 1037 holdings (SCZ holds 2044 positions and FNDC holds 1580), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCZ and FNDC?
The two portfolios are 43.2% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCZ and FNDC?
The largest positions held by both funds are PLS, IGG, 522, NEX and IMI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 4% of the total overlap.
What does SCZ own that FNDC doesn't?
1007 positions (41.8% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ, led by 5801, 4004 and 5706. In the other direction, 543 positions (38.7% of FNDC) are unique to FNDC.