SCZ vs SPEM: Holdings Overlap
SCZiShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF
iShares · 2044 holdings · $13.5B · as of 2026-04-30
SPEMState Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 2776 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (SCZ: 2026-04-30, SPEM: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SCZ and SPEM?
iShares MSCI EAFE Small-Cap ETF (SCZ, by iShares) holds 2044 positions; State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 2776. They have 10 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 10SCZ holds 2044 · SPEM holds 2776
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SCZ 0%·SPEM 0%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SCZ
2034 of 2044 positions (98.9% of the fund) are not held by SPEM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in SPEM
2766 of 2776 positions (108.8% of the fund) are not held by SCZ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCZ | +4.1% | +13.5% | +20.2% | +16.6% | +5.9% | +8.6% | 3.07% |
| SPEM | +2.8% | +13.1% | +22.8% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +8.6% | 2.48% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SCZ vs SPEM →
Shared Holdings(10)
The top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by MTLN, 868 and 1883.
 MTLNMetlen Energy & Metals PLC | 0.12% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
|---|---|---|---|
 868Xinyi Glass Holdings Ltd | 0.06% | 0.04% | 0.04% |
 1883CITIC Telecom International Holdings Ltd | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 1729Time Interconnect Technology Ltd | 0.04% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 2142HBM Holdings Ltd | 0.03% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 1860Mobvista Inc | 0.03% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
 AP4Riverstone Holdings Ltd | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
 467United Energy Group Ltd | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
 3933United Laboratories International Holdings Ltd/The | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
 1691JS Global Lifestyle Co Ltd | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SCZ and SPEM overlap?
SCZ and SPEM overlap by 0.1% of portfolio weight. They share 10 holdings (SCZ holds 2044 positions and SPEM holds 2776), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SCZ and SPEM?
The two portfolios are 0.1% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SCZ and SPEM?
The largest positions held by both funds are MTLN, 868, 1883, 1729 and 2142. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does SCZ own that SPEM doesn't?
2034 positions (98.9% of SCZ) are unique to SCZ, led by 5801, 4004 and 5706. In the other direction, 2766 positions (108.8% of SPEM) are unique to SPEM.