SPEM vs AAXJ: Holdings Overlap
SPEMState Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 2776 holdings · $17.4B · as of 2026-08-06
AAXJiShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF
iShares · 916 holdings · $3.8B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (SPEM: 2026-08-06, AAXJ: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are SPEM and AAXJ?
State Street® SPDR® Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF (SPEM, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 2776 positions; iShares MSCI All Country Asia ex Japan ETF (AAXJ, by iShares) holds 916. They have 573 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 53.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 53.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 573SPEM holds 2776 · AAXJ holds 916
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- SPEM 64%·AAXJ 64%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in SPEM
2203 of 2776 positions (44.9% of the fund) are not held by AAXJ. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | SPEM | AAXJ |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 25.3% | 39.6% |
| Financials | 15.1% | 13.9% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 7.0% | 8.1% |
| Communication Services | 5.4% | 6.4% |
| Materials | 3.8% | 1.5% |
| Other Sectors | 8.7% | 10.1% |
| Unclassified | 43.5% | 20.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (40% of SPEM, 20% of AAXJ).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPEM | +2.8% | +13.1% | +22.8% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +8.6% | 2.48% |
| AAXJ | -0.6% | +22.4% | +35.6% | +20.9% | +7.3% | +8.9% | 1.36% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in SPEM vs AAXJ →
Shared Holdings(573)
The top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the overlap, led by 2330, 700 and 9988.
14.02% | 16.28% | 14.02% | |
3.01% | 3.70% | 3.01% | |
2.36% | 2.70% | 2.36% | |
1.64% | 1.21% | 1.21% | |
0.95% | 1.30% | 0.95% | |
0.88% | 1.03% | 0.88% | |
0.96% | 0.85% | 0.85% | |
0.75% | 0.88% | 0.75% | |
0.55% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
0.54% | 0.67% | 0.54% | |
0.70% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.55% | 0.48% | 0.48% | |
0.48% | 0.51% | 0.48% | |
0.47% | 0.62% | 0.47% | |
0.43% | 0.43% | 0.43% | |
0.40% | 0.51% | 0.40% | |
0.41% | 0.39% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.42% | 0.38% | |
0.44% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.37% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.33% | 0.46% | 0.33% | |
0.30% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.33% | 0.27% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.33% | 0.27% | |
0.28% | 0.26% | 0.26% |
Showing the top 250 of 573 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do SPEM and AAXJ overlap?
SPEM and AAXJ overlap by 53.9% of portfolio weight. They share 573 holdings (SPEM holds 2776 positions and AAXJ holds 916), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both SPEM and AAXJ?
The two portfolios are 53.9% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of SPEM and AAXJ?
The largest positions held by both funds are 2330, 700, 9988, 2454 and 2308. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 47% of the total overlap.
What does SPEM own that AAXJ doesn't?
2203 positions (44.9% of SPEM) are unique to SPEM, led by RIGD, IBN and UMC. In the other direction, 343 positions (36.1% of AAXJ) are unique to AAXJ.