VB vs SCHM: Holdings Overlap
VBVanguard Small-cap Index Fund
Vanguard · 1312 holdings · $82.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Schwab · 496 holdings · $15.1B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (VB: 2026-03-31, SCHM: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are VB and SCHM?
Vanguard Small-cap Index Fund (VB, by Vanguard) holds 1312 positions; Schwab U.S. Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM, by Schwab) holds 496. They have 482 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 59.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 59.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 482VB holds 1312 · SCHM holds 496
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- VB 60%·SCHM 92%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in VB
830 of 1312 positions (39.8% of the fund) are not held by SCHM. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | VB | SCHM |
|---|---|---|
| Industrials | 21.2% | 22.5% |
| Information Technology | 13.8% | 20.2% |
| Financials | 13.4% | 11.7% |
| Health Care | 11.6% | 10.8% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 10.5% | 9.5% |
| Other Sectors | 28.5% | 25.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.7% | 0.2% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of VB, 0% of SCHM).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VB | +2.5% | +19.5% | +29.1% | +15.9% | +8.1% | +11.3% | 1.18% |
| SCHM | +1.6% | +20.7% | +28.9% | +15.8% | +8.2% | +11.2% | 1.22% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in VB vs SCHM →
Shared Holdings(482)
The top 10 shared positions account for 6% of the overlap, led by TPR, FTI and CIEN.
0.40% | 0.55% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 0.51% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 1.52% | 0.38% | |
0.38% | 0.53% | 0.38% | |
0.36% | 0.44% | 0.36% | |
0.35% | 0.50% | 0.35% | |
0.35% | 0.51% | 0.35% | |
0.35% | 1.13% | 0.35% | |
0.34% | 1.03% | 0.34% | |
0.33% | 0.42% | 0.33% | |
0.31% | 1.26% | 0.31% | |
0.30% | 0.47% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.34% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.52% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.39% | 0.30% | |
0.30% | 0.39% | 0.30% | |
0.28% | 0.33% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.43% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.32% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.44% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.39% | 0.28% | |
0.28% | 0.31% | 0.28% | |
0.27% | 0.50% | 0.27% | |
0.27% | 0.54% | 0.27% | |
0.26% | 0.33% | 0.26% |
Showing the top 250 of 482 shared holdings by overlap weight.
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do VB and SCHM overlap?
VB and SCHM overlap by 59.8% of portfolio weight. They share 482 holdings (VB holds 1312 positions and SCHM holds 496), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both VB and SCHM?
The two portfolios are 59.8% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of VB and SCHM?
The largest positions held by both funds are TPR, FTI, CIEN, CASY and UTHR. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 6% of the total overlap.
What does VB own that SCHM doesn't?
830 positions (39.8% of VB) are unique to VB, led by EME, NRG and ATO. In the other direction, 14 positions (7.5% of SCHM) are unique to SCHM.