VTV vs XLK: Holdings Overlap
Vanguard · 311 holdings · $191.4B · as of 2026-03-31
XLKState Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 73 holdings · $122.8B · as of 2026-08-06
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (VTV: 2026-03-31, XLK: 2026-08-06). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are VTV and XLK?
Vanguard Value Index Fund (VTV, by Vanguard) holds 311 positions; State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 73. They have 28 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 9.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 9.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 28VTV holds 311 · XLK holds 73
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- VTV 10%·XLK 26%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in VTV
283 of 311 positions (89.8% of the fund) are not held by XLK. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | VTV | XLK |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 9.9% | 99.9% |
| Financials | 21.9% | 0.0% |
| Health Care | 15.3% | 0.0% |
| Industrials | 14.4% | 0.0% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.5% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 27.8% | 0.0% |
| Unclassified | 0.6% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of VTV, 0% of XLK).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VTV | +2.2% | +18.7% | +29.5% | +18.0% | +12.5% | +12.6% | 1.82% |
| XLK | +4.9% | +30.9% | +43.5% | +30.7% | +20.3% | +24.4% | 0.42% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in VTV vs XLK →
Shared Holdings(28)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by MU, CSCO and IBM.
1.56% | 3.70% | 1.56% | |
1.13% | 3.15% | 1.13% | |
0.93% | 1.45% | 0.93% | |
0.72% | 3.11% | 0.72% | |
0.64% | 1.22% | 0.64% | |
0.56% | 1.12% | 0.56% | |
0.56% | 2.77% | 0.56% | |
0.50% | 0.69% | 0.50% | |
0.43% | 0.81% | 0.43% | |
0.36% | 1.67% | 0.36% | |
0.34% | 1.01% | 0.34% | |
0.25% | 0.41% | 0.25% | |
0.20% | 0.84% | 0.20% | |
0.20% | 0.38% | 0.20% | |
0.19% | 1.03% | 0.19% | |
0.15% | 0.26% | 0.15% | |
0.14% | 0.27% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.46% | 0.13% | |
0.12% | 0.18% | 0.12% | |
0.11% | 0.21% | 0.11% | |
0.10% | 0.20% | 0.10% | |
0.08% | 0.25% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 0.17% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 0.18% | 0.05% | |
0.03% | 0.12% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do VTV and XLK overlap?
VTV and XLK overlap by 9.6% of portfolio weight. They share 28 holdings (VTV holds 311 positions and XLK holds 73), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both VTV and XLK?
The two portfolios are 9.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of VTV and XLK?
The largest positions held by both funds are MU, CSCO, IBM, INTC and ADI. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does VTV own that XLK doesn't?
283 positions (89.8% of VTV) are unique to VTV, led by BRK-B, JPM and XOM. In the other direction, 45 positions (74.0% of XLK) are unique to XLK.