XLK vs SMH: Holdings Overlap
XLKState Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 73 holdings · $122.8B · as of 2026-08-06
VanEck · 25 holdings · $71.5B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 128 days apart (XLK: 2026-08-06, SMH: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XLK and SMH?
State Street® Technology Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLK, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 73 positions; VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH, by VanEck) holds 25. They have 20 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 45.7% identical. In practical terms the pair is moderately overlapping; they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds distinct exposure.
- Overlap by Weight
- 45.7%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 20XLK holds 73 · SMH holds 25
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XLK 46%·SMH 81%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XLK
53 of 73 positions (54.2% of the fund) are not held by SMH. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XLK | SMH |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 99.9% | 99.9% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts.
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLK | +4.9% | +30.9% | +43.5% | +30.7% | +20.3% | +24.4% | 0.42% |
| SMH | +0.2% | +61.8% | +100.8% | +55.9% | +34.9% | +34.9% | 0.19% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XLK vs SMH →
Shared Holdings(20)
The top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the overlap, led by NVDA, AVGO and AMD.
14.35% | 19.64% | 14.35% | |
5.39% | 7.79% | 5.39% | |
4.11% | 4.68% | 4.11% | |
3.70% | 4.23% | 3.70% | |
3.11% | 4.34% | 3.11% | |
2.77% | 4.59% | 2.77% | |
2.53% | 4.60% | 2.53% | |
1.67% | 4.61% | 1.67% | |
1.67% | 4.74% | 1.67% | |
1.22% | 2.35% | 1.22% | |
1.22% | 4.70% | 1.22% | |
1.12% | 4.09% | 1.12% | |
0.62% | 2.43% | 0.62% | |
0.51% | 2.50% | 0.51% | |
0.44% | 1.23% | 0.44% | |
0.40% | 1.41% | 0.40% | |
0.39% | 1.24% | 0.39% | |
0.27% | 1.00% | 0.27% | |
0.20% | 0.60% | 0.20% | |
0.07% | 0.21% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XLK and SMH overlap?
XLK and SMH overlap by 45.7% of portfolio weight. They share 20 holdings (XLK holds 73 positions and SMH holds 25), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XLK and SMH?
The two portfolios are 45.7% identical by weight. Owning both is defensible: they share a meaningful core, but each fund adds exposure the other lacks.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XLK and SMH?
The largest positions held by both funds are NVDA, AVGO, AMD, MU and INTC. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 89% of the total overlap.
What does XLK own that SMH doesn't?
53 positions (54.2% of XLK) are unique to XLK, led by AAPL, MSFT and CSCO. In the other direction, 5 positions (18.9% of SMH) are unique to SMH.