XLV vs XT: Holdings Overlap
XLVState Street® Health Care Select Sector SPDR® ETF
State Street (SPDR) · 61 holdings · $41.9B · as of 2026-08-06
XTiShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF
iShares · 219 holdings · $3.9B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 98 days apart (XLV: 2026-08-06, XT: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are XLV and XT?
State Street® Health Care Select Sector SPDR® ETF (XLV, by State Street (SPDR)) holds 61 positions; iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT, by iShares) holds 219. They have 17 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 15.8% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 15.8%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 17XLV holds 61 · XT holds 219
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- XLV 60%·XT 16%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in XLV
44 of 61 positions (39.7% of the fund) are not held by XT. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | XLV | XT |
|---|---|---|
| Health Care | 99.8% | 23.2% |
| Information Technology | 0.0% | 42.5% |
| Industrials | 0.0% | 9.6% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 0.0% | 7.2% |
| Communication Services | 0.0% | 5.2% |
| Other Sectors | 0.0% | 10.1% |
| Unclassified | 0.0% | 2.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (0% of XLV, 2% of XT).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| XLV | +0.8% | +7.9% | +30.7% | +9.2% | +6.2% | +10.0% | 1.53% |
| XT | +1.0% | +19.3% | +36.3% | +17.3% | +7.2% | +14.1% | 6.87% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in XLV vs XT →
Shared Holdings(17)
The top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the overlap, led by LLY, JNJ and ABBV.
15.88% | 3.40% | 3.40% | |
10.42% | 2.66% | 2.66% | |
7.26% | 1.79% | 1.79% | |
2.23% | 1.64% | 1.64% | |
5.34% | 1.35% | 1.35% | |
3.68% | 0.90% | 0.90% | |
2.74% | 0.78% | 0.78% | |
2.52% | 0.73% | 0.73% | |
2.21% | 0.59% | 0.59% | |
2.12% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
2.07% | 0.55% | 0.55% | |
1.30% | 0.33% | 0.33% | |
0.67% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.66% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.51% | 0.13% | 0.13% | |
0.32% | 0.07% | 0.07% | |
0.21% | 0.05% | 0.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do XLV and XT overlap?
XLV and XT overlap by 15.8% of portfolio weight. They share 17 holdings (XLV holds 61 positions and XT holds 219), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both XLV and XT?
The two portfolios are 15.8% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of XLV and XT?
The largest positions held by both funds are LLY, JNJ, ABBV, ISRG and MRK. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the total overlap.
What does XLV own that XT doesn't?
44 positions (39.7% of XLV) are unique to XLV, led by UNH, TMO and ABT. In the other direction, 202 positions (83.9% of XT) are unique to XT.