ACWV vs EMXC: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
EMXCiShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
iShares · 663 holdings · $23.8B · as of 2026-05-31
How similar are ACWV and EMXC?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF (EMXC, by iShares) holds 663. They have 112 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 10.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 10.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 112ACWV holds 412 · EMXC holds 663
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 14%·EMXC 40%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
300 of 412 positions (84.9% of the fund) are not held by EMXC. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in EMXC
551 of 663 positions (60.0% of the fund) are not held by ACWV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | EMXC |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 49.6% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 12.0% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 1.0% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 2.2% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 1.6% |
| Other Sectors | 23.5% | 13.7% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 19.8% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 20% of EMXC).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| EMXC | -2.1% | +31.1% | +51.2% | +24.8% | +11.5% | — | 2.03% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs EMXC →
Shared Holdings(112)
The top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the overlap, led by TSMWF, 2303 and 000660.
1.22% | 17.94% | 1.22% | |
1.08% | 0.50% | 0.50% | |
0.49% | 8.35% | 0.49% | |
0.52% | 0.49% | 0.49% | |
0.48% | 1.07% | 0.48% | |
0.39% | 0.44% | 0.39% | |
0.38% | 0.23% | 0.23% | |
0.33% | 0.21% | 0.21% | |
0.19% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.20% | 0.17% | 0.17% | |
0.35% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.16% | 0.17% | 0.16% | |
0.15% | 0.23% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.15% | 0.15% | |
0.15% | 0.18% | 0.15% | |
0.18% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.30% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.18% | 0.14% | |
0.16% | 0.14% | 0.14% | |
0.14% | 0.24% | 0.14% | |
0.13% | 0.22% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.30% | 0.13% | |
0.13% | 0.15% | 0.13% | |
0.25% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.21% | 0.11% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and EMXC overlap?
ACWV and EMXC overlap by 10.6% of portfolio weight. They share 112 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and EMXC holds 663), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and EMXC?
The two portfolios are 10.6% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and EMXC?
The largest positions held by both funds are TSMWF, 2303, 000660, BHARTI and 005935. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 41% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that EMXC doesn't?
300 positions (84.9% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and DUK. In the other direction, 551 positions (60.0% of EMXC) are unique to EMXC.