ACWV vs IGF: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
IGFiShares Global Infrastructure ETF
iShares · 88 holdings · $11.0B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, IGF: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and IGF?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares Global Infrastructure ETF (IGF, by iShares) holds 88. They have 29 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 5.3% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 5.3%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 29ACWV holds 412 · IGF holds 88
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 5%·IGF 31%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
383 of 412 positions (94.0% of the fund) are not held by IGF. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Only in IGF
59 of 88 positions (68.3% of the fund) are not held by ACWV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | IGF |
|---|---|---|
| Utilities | 7.3% | 39.3% |
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 2.9% | 20.7% |
| Industrials | 6.8% | 18.2% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 40.0% | 0.1% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 21.4% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 21% of IGF).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| IGF | -1.8% | +9.0% | +12.6% | +16.5% | +10.6% | +8.0% | 2.93% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs IGF →
Shared Holdings(29)
The top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the overlap, led by DUK, SO and ED.
1.22% | 2.80% | 1.22% | |
1.08% | 2.90% | 1.08% | |
0.81% | 1.13% | 0.81% | |
0.74% | 0.98% | 0.74% | |
0.28% | 4.81% | 0.28% | |
0.20% | 2.39% | 0.20% | |
0.16% | 1.98% | 0.16% | |
0.14% | 2.53% | 0.14% | |
0.12% | 1.28% | 0.12% | |
0.09% | 3.14% | 0.09% | |
0.09% | 0.14% | 0.09% | |
0.08% | 0.08% | 0.08% | |
0.08% | 0.09% | 0.08% | |
0.07% | 3.93% | 0.07% | |
0.05% | 1.08% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 0.76% | 0.05% | |
0.05% | 1.36% | 0.05% | |
| SINGAPORE DOLLARS | 0.01% | 0.02% | 0.01% |
| HONG KONG DOLLAR | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| Euro | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
| JAPANESE YEN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| SWISS FRANC | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| KOREAN WON | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| CANADIAN DOLLAR | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% |
| DANISH KRONER | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and IGF overlap?
ACWV and IGF overlap by 5.3% of portfolio weight. They share 29 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and IGF holds 88), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and IGF?
The two portfolios are 5.3% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and IGF?
The largest positions held by both funds are DUK, SO, ED, WEC and AENA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 91% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that IGF doesn't?
383 positions (94.0% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 59 positions (68.3% of IGF) are unique to IGF.