ACWV vs IGV: Holdings Overlap
ACWViShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
iShares · 412 holdings · $3.4B · as of 2026-05-31
IGViShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF
iShares · 112 holdings · $14.7B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 61 days apart (ACWV: 2026-05-31, IGV: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are ACWV and IGV?
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV, by iShares) holds 412 positions; iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV, by iShares) holds 112. They have 18 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 6.1% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 6.1%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 18ACWV holds 412 · IGV holds 112
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- ACWV 6%·IGV 51%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in ACWV
394 of 412 positions (93.2% of the fund) are not held by IGV. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | ACWV | IGV |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 24.2% | 90.6% |
| Financials | 12.9% | 0.2% |
| Health Care | 12.5% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 11.5% | 8.2% |
| Consumer Staples | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 23.5% | 0.4% |
| Unclassified | 5.1% | 0.5% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (5% of ACWV, 0% of IGV).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ACWV | +3.3% | +7.6% | +9.5% | +11.3% | +6.1% | +7.4% | 1.87% |
| IGV | +9.1% | -2.8% | -6.3% | +13.8% | +4.6% | +16.7% | 0.02% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in ACWV vs IGV →
Shared Holdings(18)
The top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the overlap, led by MSFT, ROP and EA.
 MSFTMicrosoft Corp. COM | 1.13% | 8.36% | 1.13% |
|---|---|---|---|
 ROPRoper Technologies Inc COM | 0.74% | 1.61% | 0.74% |
 EAElectronic Arts Inc. COM | 0.52% | 1.97% | 0.52% |
 ADSKAutodesk Inc COM | 0.42% | 2.17% | 0.42% |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks Inc COM | 0.35% | 5.48% | 0.35% |
 ZMZoom Communications, Inc., Class A | 0.30% | 0.91% | 0.30% |
 CRMSalesforce Inc. COM | 0.30% | 7.40% | 0.30% |
 NOWServicenow Inc COM | 0.30% | 4.38% | 0.30% |
 ADBEAdobe Inc COM | 0.29% | 4.27% | 0.29% |
 TYLTyler Technologies Inc. COM | 0.28% | 0.63% | 0.28% |
 FTNTFortinet Inc COM | 0.28% | 2.21% | 0.28% |
 PTCPTC Inc COM | 0.26% | 0.73% | 0.26% |
 WDAYWorkday, Inc., Class A | 0.23% | 1.18% | 0.23% |
 INTUIntuit Inc COM | 0.21% | 4.75% | 0.21% |
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 0.17% | 0.44% | 0.17% |
 FICOFair Isaac Corporation COM | 0.15% | 1.08% | 0.15% |
 DSGXDescartes Systems Group, Inc. (The) | 0.13% | 0.26% | 0.13% |
 CDNSCadence Design Systems, Inc. COM | 0.07% | 3.24% | 0.07% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do ACWV and IGV overlap?
ACWV and IGV overlap by 6.1% of portfolio weight. They share 18 holdings (ACWV holds 412 positions and IGV holds 112), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both ACWV and IGV?
The two portfolios are 6.1% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of ACWV and IGV?
The largest positions held by both funds are MSFT, ROP, EA, ADSK and PANW. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 75% of the total overlap.
What does ACWV own that IGV doesn't?
394 positions (93.2% of ACWV) are unique to ACWV, led by CSCO, JNJ and TSMWF. In the other direction, 94 positions (48.9% of IGV) are unique to IGV.