CALF vs CGGO: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
CGGOCapital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Capital Group · 104 holdings · $11.5B · as of 2026-05-31
Holdings snapshots are 31 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, CGGO: 2026-05-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and CGGO?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF (CGGO, by Capital Group) holds 104. They have 1 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 0.6% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 0.6%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 1CALF holds 200 · CGGO holds 104
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 1%·CGGO 1%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
199 of 200 positions (99.4% of the fund) are not held by CGGO. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | CGGO |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 39.1% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 8.3% |
| Industrials | 8.9% | 13.4% |
| Financials | 0.0% | 10.4% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 1.5% |
| Other Sectors | 26.0% | 22.4% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 3.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 3% of CGGO).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| CGGO | -0.2% | +17.3% | +26.5% | +20.0% | — | — | 0.98% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs CGGO →
Shared Holdings(1)
 EPAMEPAM Systems Inc | 0.58% | 0.56% | 0.56% |
|---|
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and CGGO overlap?
CALF and CGGO overlap by 0.6% of portfolio weight. They share 1 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and CGGO holds 104), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and CGGO?
The two portfolios are 0.6% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and CGGO?
The largest positions held by both funds are EPAM. Together the top 1 shared positions account for 99% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that CGGO doesn't?
199 positions (99.4% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 103 positions (97.7% of CGGO) are unique to CGGO.