CALF vs CIBR: Holdings Overlap
CALFPacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF
Pacer · 200 holdings · $3.7B · as of 2026-04-30
CIBRFirst Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF
First Trust · 42 holdings · $15.3B · as of 2026-03-31
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CALF: 2026-04-30, CIBR: 2026-03-31). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CALF and CIBR?
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows 100 ETF (CALF, by Pacer) holds 200 positions; First Trust Nasdaq Cybersecurity ETF (CIBR, by First Trust) holds 42. They have 6 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 4.9% identical. In practical terms the pair is essentially distinct, holding almost none of the same securities.
- Overlap by Weight
- 4.9%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 6CALF holds 200 · CIBR holds 42
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CALF 5%·CIBR 6%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CALF
194 of 200 positions (95.0% of the fund) are not held by CIBR. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CALF | CIBR |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 26.3% | 88.7% |
| Consumer Discretionary | 28.3% | 0.0% |
| Energy | 9.6% | 0.0% |
| Communication Services | 9.5% | 2.1% |
| Health Care | 9.1% | 0.0% |
| Other Sectors | 16.3% | 6.5% |
| Unclassified | 0.9% | 2.1% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (1% of CALF, 2% of CIBR).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CALF | +8.4% | +27.1% | +42.3% | +9.9% | +6.8% | — | 1.08% |
| CIBR | +6.1% | +37.3% | +38.2% | +29.9% | +15.5% | +18.9% | 0.40% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CALF vs CIBR →
Shared Holdings(6)
The top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the overlap, led by NTAP, GEN and NTCT.
 NTAPNetApp Inc. COM | 2.05% | 2.03% | 2.03% |
|---|---|---|---|
 GENGen Digital Inc COM | 1.61% | 2.27% | 1.61% |
 NTCTNETSCOUT Systems Inc. COM | 0.35% | 0.47% | 0.35% |
 ZDZiff Davis Inc COM | 0.38% | 0.32% | 0.32% |
 QLYSQualys Inc COM | 0.30% | 0.65% | 0.30% |
 TENBTenable Holdings Inc COM | 0.29% | 0.42% | 0.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CALF and CIBR overlap?
CALF and CIBR overlap by 4.9% of portfolio weight. They share 6 holdings (CALF holds 200 positions and CIBR holds 42), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CALF and CIBR?
The two portfolios are 4.9% identical by weight. Owning both is genuine diversification: the funds hold almost none of the same securities.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CALF and CIBR?
The largest positions held by both funds are NTAP, GEN, NTCT, ZD and QLYS. Together the top 6 shared positions account for 100% of the total overlap.
What does CALF own that CIBR doesn't?
194 positions (95.0% of CALF) are unique to CALF, led by ZM, SNX and APA. In the other direction, 36 positions (93.3% of CIBR) are unique to CIBR.