CGBL vs SUSA: Holdings Overlap
CGBLCapital Group Core Balanced ETF
Capital Group · 73 holdings · $7.5B · as of 2026-03-31
SUSAiShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
iShares · 170 holdings · $4.1B · as of 2026-04-30
Holdings snapshots are 30 days apart (CGBL: 2026-03-31, SUSA: 2026-04-30). Weights and index membership change between snapshots, so the true current overlap is typically higher than shown. For funds tracking the same index, the gap can be 5–15 points.
How similar are CGBL and SUSA?
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF (CGBL, by Capital Group) holds 73 positions; iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF (SUSA, by iShares) holds 170. They have 24 holdings in common, and by portfolio weight the two funds are 20.0% identical. In practical terms the pair is lightly overlapping, with most of each portfolio distinct.
- Overlap by Weight
- 20.0%Sum of the smaller weight of each shared holding
- Shared Holdings
- 24CGBL holds 73 · SUSA holds 170
- Weight in Shared Holdings
- CGBL 26%·SUSA 36%Share of each fund's weight in stocks both funds own
Based on each fund's latest official holdings. How is this calculated?
What makes each fund different
Only in CGBL
49 of 73 positions (72.2% of the fund) are not held by SUSA. Showing the top 30 by weight.
Sector Breakdown
| Sector | CGBL | SUSA |
|---|---|---|
| Information Technology | 16.3% | 38.2% |
| Financials | 9.0% | 11.9% |
| Industrials | 10.2% | 11.3% |
| Health Care | 6.1% | 9.0% |
| Communication Services | 4.5% | 8.5% |
| Other Sectors | 15.8% | 21.0% |
| Unclassified | 36.1% | 0.0% |
Share of each fund's portfolio weight by GICS-style sector, compiled from issuer fund data and our own classification of the holdings, not the issuers' published sector charts. “Unclassified” is weight we could not classify (37% of CGBL, 0% of SUSA).
Performance
| Fund | 1M | YTD | 1Y | 3Y (ann.) | 5Y (ann.) | 10Y (ann.) | Yield |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGBL | +2.1% | +9.5% | +16.6% | — | — | — | 1.83% |
| SUSA | +3.0% | +14.4% | +24.2% | +19.9% | +11.2% | +14.9% | 0.82% |
Total returns including dividends, from adjusted daily closes as of 2026-08-07. 3Y/5Y/10Y are annualized. Yield is trailing-12-month distributions over the last close. Past performance does not predict future results.
Project the growth of $10,000 in CGBL vs SUSA →
Shared Holdings(24)
The top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the overlap, led by AVGO, MSFT and GOOG.
4.16% | 3.07% | 3.07% | |
2.78% | 4.35% | 2.78% | |
2.49% | 3.84% | 2.49% | |
1.45% | 5.35% | 1.45% | |
1.33% | 7.92% | 1.33% | |
1.08% | 1.11% | 1.08% | |
0.85% | 0.92% | 0.85% | |
0.84% | 0.97% | 0.84% | |
0.78% | 0.96% | 0.78% | |
0.68% | 1.21% | 0.68% | |
0.84% | 0.63% | 0.63% | |
0.77% | 0.57% | 0.57% | |
0.53% | 1.14% | 0.53% | |
0.46% | 0.78% | 0.46% | |
0.39% | 0.66% | 0.39% | |
0.35% | 0.55% | 0.35% | |
1.11% | 0.35% | 0.35% | |
0.61% | 0.31% | 0.31% | |
1.25% | 0.29% | 0.29% | |
0.71% | 0.26% | 0.26% | |
0.86% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.52% | 0.16% | 0.16% | |
0.46% | 0.12% | 0.12% | |
0.59% | 0.10% | 0.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
How much do CGBL and SUSA overlap?
CGBL and SUSA overlap by 20.0% of portfolio weight. They share 24 holdings (CGBL holds 73 positions and SUSA holds 170), based on each fund's latest SEC-reported holdings.
Is it redundant to own both CGBL and SUSA?
The two portfolios are 20.0% identical by weight. Owning both is not redundant. Most of each portfolio is distinct, so the funds can serve different roles.
What are the biggest shared holdings of CGBL and SUSA?
The largest positions held by both funds are AVGO, MSFT, GOOG, AAPL and NVDA. Together the top 10 shared positions account for 77% of the total overlap.
What does CGBL own that SUSA doesn't?
49 positions (72.2% of CGBL) are unique to CGBL, led by CGCP, CGCB and TSM. In the other direction, 146 positions (64.1% of SUSA) are unique to SUSA.